Filing 5

ORDER granting re 3 MOTION filed by ERIC SMITH. ORDER granting 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by ERIC SMITH. Judgment dismissing the action without prejudice shall now issue. Copy to petitioner via US Mail. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 3/5/2012.(RSF)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA ERIC SMITH, Petitioner, vs. SUPERINTENDENT BROWN, Respondent. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 2:12-CV-46-JMS-WGH Entry and Order Directing Dismissal of Action Eric Smith is serving the executed sentence imposed by an Indiana state court following his conviction for arson. See Smith v. State, 779 N.E.2d 978 (Ind. Ct. App. Nov.19, 2002), trans. denied. In this action seeking a writ of habeas corpus, Smith challenges the validity of a prison disciplinary proceeding. Because of his abusive litigation in federal courts, Smith has been sanctioned through the issuance of a restricted filer order. The order in Smith=s case was issued by the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals in No. 09-2444 on June 10, 2009. The text of the restrictive filer Order is the following: Smith is fined $500. Until he pays that sum in full to the clerk of this court, he is barred from filing further civil suits in the courts of this circuit, in accordance with Support Systems International v. Mack, 345 F.3d 185 (7th Cir. 1995). This court is fully bound, as are the litigants before it, by the orders of a higher court, and "[i]n a hierarchical system, decisions of a superior court are authoritative on inferior courts." Reiser v. Residential Funding Corp., 380 F.3d 1027, 1029 (7th Cir. 2004). "[D]istrict judges must follow the decisions of this court whether or not they agree." Id. Smith violated the Court of Appeals= Order in No. 09-2444 by submitting this action. He cannot obtain the relief he seeks, which is evident from the face of his petition for writ of habeas corpus. The action is therefore dismissed pursuant to Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Proceedings in the United States District Courts. Smith’s request to proceed in forma pauperis [2] is granted. In addition, his motion for file-stamped copy of petition [3] is granted and a copy of the requested material shall be included with the distribution of this Entry. Judgment dismissing the action without prejudice shall now issue. IT IS SO ORDERED. 03/05/2012 Date: __________________ _______________________________ Hon. Jane Magnus-Stinson, Judge United States District Court Southern District of Indiana Note to Clerk: Processing this document requires actions in addition to docketing and distribution.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?