SMITH v. SUPERINTENDENT

Filing 5

ORDER that Smith violated the Court of Appeals Order in No. 09-2444 by submitting this action. The action is dismissed. Judgment dismissing the action without prejudice shall now issue. ORDER granting 3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. (copy to Petitioner via US Mail) Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 6/26/2012. (SMD)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA ERIC SMITH, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Petitioner, vs. SUPERINTENDENT, Respondent. 2:12-cv-171-JMS-WGH Entry and Order Directing Dismissal of Action I. Eric Smith is serving the executed sentence imposed by an Indiana state court following his conviction for arson. See Smith v. State, 779 N.E.2d 978 (Ind. Ct. App. 2002), trans. denied. He has filed the present action seeking a writ of habeas corpus challenging a prison disciplinary proceeding. Because of his abusive litigation in federal courts, Smith has been sanctioned through the issuance of a species of restricted filer orders. The Order in Smith=s case was issued by the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals in No. 09-2444 on June 10, 2009. The text of the restrictive filer Order is the following: Smith is fined $500. Until he pays that sum in full to the clerk of this court, he is barred from filing further civil suits in the courts of this circuit, in accordance with Support Systems International v. Mack, 345 F.3d 185 (7th Cir. 1995). Smith violated the Court of Appeals= Order in No. 09-2444 by submitting this action. The action is dismissed. Judgment dismissing the action without prejudice shall now issue. II. The petitioner’s request to proceed in forma pauperis [3] is granted. IT IS SO ORDERED. 06/26/2012 Date: ______________________ _______________________________ Hon. Jane Magnus-Stinson, Judge United States District Court Southern District of Indiana Distribution: Eric D. Smith #112675 Westville Correctional Facility 5501 South 1100 West Westville, IN 46391

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?