NEAL v. OLIVER

Filing 47

Order Denying Motion to Alter or Amend Judgment - The petitioner's motion to alter or amend judgment [dkt. 45] is treated as labeled in relation to final judgment issued on July 1, 2013, and as so treated is denied. The reason for this ruling is that the action was properly dismissed for the reasons explained in the Entry of April 24, 2012. Copy to petitioner via US Mail. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 7/22/2013. (RSF)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA
TERRE HAUTE DIVISION
ROBERT DAVID NEAL,
Petitioner,
vs.
JOHN C. OLIVER,
Respondent.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

2:12-cv-193-JMS-WGH

Order Denying Motion to Alter or Amend Judgment
The petitioner’s motion to alter or amend judgment [dkt. 45] is treated as labeled in relation
to final judgment issued on July 1, 2013, and as so treated is denied. The reason for this ruling is
that the action was properly dismissed for the reasons explained in the Entry of April 24, 2012.
Harrington v. City of Chicago, 433 F.3d 542, 546 (7th Cir. 2006) (AAltering or amending a
judgment under Rule 59(e) is permissible when there is newly discovered evidence or there has
been a manifest error of law or fact.@)(citing Bordelon v. Chicago Sch. Reform Bd. of Trs., 233
F.3d 524, 529 (7th Cir. 2000)).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
07/22/2013
Date: __________________

Distribution:
Robert David Neal
#15151-180
Terre Haute USP
P.O. Box 33
Terre Haute, IN 47808
[e-mail]

_______________________________
Hon. Jane Magnus-Stinson, Judge
United States District Court
Southern District of Indiana