THOMAS v. KELLER et al

Filing 4

Entry and Order Directing Dismissal of Action - denying 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. This action is dismissed without prejudice. Judgment consistent with this Entry shall now issue. (See Entry.) Copy to plaintiff via US Mail. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 8/27/2012. (RSF)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA JOHN ERIC THOMAS, Plaintiff, vs. CORRECTIONAL OFFICER BRADLEY KELLER, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 2:12-cv-238-JMS-DKL Entry and Order Directing Dismissal of Action Plaintiff=s complaint is accompanied by his request to proceed in forma pauperis. As set forth in Thomas v. Donahue, No. 2:08-cv-142-RLY-WGH (S.D. Ind. June 6, 2008), and again in Thomas v. Buss, 2:10-cv-154-JMS-DML (S.D. Ind. June 17, 2010), the plaintiff has Astruck out@ under 28 U.S.C. ' 1915. The rulings in each of those cases set forth the specific information regarding the plaintiff=s prior Astrikes@ as contemplated in Evans v. Illinois Department of Corrections,150 F.3d 810 (7th Cir. 1998). This renders him ineligible to proceed in forma pauperis. These circumstances trigger the rule of Sloan v. Lesza, 181 F.3d 857, 859 (7th Cir. 1999): An effort to bamboozle the court by seeking permission to proceed in forma pauperis after a federal judge has held that '1915(g) applies to a particular litigant will lead to immediate termination of the suit. Accordingly, plaintiff=s application to proceed in forma pauperis [2] is denied and this action is dismissed without prejudice. Judgment consistent with this Entry shall now issue. IT IS SO ORDERED. 08/27/2012 Date: __________________ _______________________________ Hon. Jane Magnus-Stinson, Judge United States District Court Southern District of Indiana Distribution: John Eric Thomas DOC #137153 Wabash Valley Correctional Facility 6908 S. Old US Highway 41 Carlisle, IN 47838

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?