HARRIS v. OLIVER

Filing 23

ORDER denying 20 Motion for Leave to Appeal in forma pauperis. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 8/29/2013 (copy sent to William Oscar Harris)(copy sent to COA via e-mail) (CBU)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA TERRE HAUTE DIVISION WILLIAM OSCAR HARRIS, Petitioner, v. JOHN C. OLIVER, Respondent. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 2:13-cv-043-JMS-WGH Entry Discussing Request to Proceed on Appeal In Forma Pauperis The petitioner has filed a notice of appeal of the order denying his ex parte motion to stay proceedings to arbitrate. The petitioner seeks leave to proceed on appeal without prepayment of the appellate fees of $455.00. An appeal may not be taken in forma pauperis if the trial court certifies that the appeal is not taken in good faith. 28 U.S.C. § 1915; see Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438 (1962). "Good faith" within the meaning of § 1915 must be judged by an objective, not a subjective, standard. See id. There is no objectively reasonable argument the petitioner could present to argue that the ruling in the order denying the motion to stay was erroneous. In pursuing an appeal, therefore, the petitioner “is acting in bad faith . . . [because] to sue in bad faith means merely to sue on the basis of a frivolous claim, which is to say a claim that no reasonable person could suppose to have any merit.” Lee v. Clinton, 209 F.3d 1025, 1026 (7th Cir. 2000). Accordingly, his appeal is not taken in good faith, and for this reason his request for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis [dkt. 20] is denied. IT IS SO ORDERED. _______________________________ 08/29/2013 Date: _________________ Hon. Jane Magnus-Stinson, Judge United States District Court Southern District of Indiana Distribution: William Oscar Harris #40743-050 Terre Haute FCI Inmate Mail/Parcels P.O. Box 33 Terre Haute, IN 47808 All electronically registered counsel

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?