WARREN v. OLIVER

Filing 4

Entry and Order Dismissing Action - Warren's habeas petition is dismissed. Warren's motion for emergency order [dkt. 3] is denied as moot. Judgment consistent with this Entry shall now issue. (See Entry.) Copy to petitioner via US Mail. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 5/7/2013.(RSF)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA TERRE HAUTE DIVISION RICHARD EUGENE WARREN, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Petitioner, vs. JOHN OLIVER, Warden, Respondent. No. 2:13-cv-00061-JMS-WGH Entry and Order Dismissing Action I. Habeas petitioner Richard Eugene Warren is confined in this district and seeks a writ of habeas corpus based on his challenge to the requirement that mailing labels be used on his outgoing mail. Warren shall have through June 4, 2013, in which to either pay the $5.00 filing fee or demonstrate that he lacks the financial means to do so. Habeas corpus review is available only Awhere the deprivation of rights is such that it necessarily impacts the fact or length of detention.@ Leamer v. Fauver, 288 F.3d 532, 540 (3d Cir. 2002). This means, in part, that a challenge to the conditions of confinement may not be brought pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ' 2241. Graham v. Broglin, 922 F.2d 379, 381 (7th Cir. 1991); Falcon v. U.S. Bureau of Prisons, 52 F.3d 137, 138-39 (7th Cir. 1995). Accordingly, Warren’s habeas petition is summarily dismissed. Warren’s motion for emergency order [dkt. 3] is denied as moot. II. Judgment consistent with this Entry shall now issue. IT IS SO ORDERED. 05/07/2013 Date: __________________ _______________________________ Hon. Jane Magnus-Stinson, Judge United States District Court Southern District of Indiana Distribution: RICHARD EUGENE WARREN 70874-083 TERRE HAUTE FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION Inmate Mail/Parcels P.O. BOX 33 TERRE HAUTE, IN 47808

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?