HUGHES v. LEVENHAGEN

Filing 8

Entry and Order Dismissing Action - This is an action brought by an Indiana prisoner who seeks habeas corpus relief with respect to a prison disciplinary proceeding, WVS-05-10-0013. On March 5, 2013, the petitioner was directed to file an amend ed petition for writ of habeas corpus and to do so not later than March 29, 2013. No amended petition for writ of habeas corpus has been filed. No filing referencing the Entry of March 5, 2013, has been made. The court concludes based on the foregoing that the petitioner has abandoned the action, which shall be dismissed without prejudice. Judgment consistent with this Entry shall now issue. Copy to petitioner via US Mail. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 4/2/2013.(RSF)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA DARRELL WAYNE HUGHES, Petitioner, vs. MARK LEVENHAGEN, Respondent. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 2:13-cv-74-JMS-WGH Entry and Order Dismissing Action I. This is an action brought by an Indiana prisoner who seeks habeas corpus relief with respect to a prison disciplinary proceeding, WVS-05-10-0013. On March 5, 2013, the petitioner was directed to file an amended petition for writ of habeas corpus and to do so not later than March 29, 2013. No amended petition for writ of habeas corpus has been filed. No filing referencing the Entry of March 5, 2013, has been made. The court concludes based on the foregoing that the petitioner has abandoned the action, which shall be dismissed without prejudice. II. Judgment consistent with this Entry shall now issue. IT IS SO ORDERED. _______________________________ 04/02/2013 Date: __________________ Distribution: Darrell Wayne Hughes 960992 Westville Correctional Facility Inmate Mail/Parcels 5501 South 1100 West Westville, IN 46391 Hon. Jane Magnus-Stinson, Judge United States District Court Southern District of Indiana

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?