KASSAR v. OLIVER
Filing
4
Entry and Order Dismissing Action - Because Kassar's petition for writ of habeas corpus challenges the conditions of his confinement, not the fact or length of his detention, his habeas petition is summarily dismissed. Judgment consistent with this Entry shall now issue. (See Entry.) Copy to petitioner via US Mail. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 6/3/2013.(RSF)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA
TERRE HAUTE DIVISION
MONZER AL KASSAR,
vs.
JOHN C. OLIVER,
)
)
Petitioner,
)
)
)
)
)
)
Respondent. )
)
2:13-cv-166-JMS-WGH
Entry and Order Dismissing Action
I.
Monzer Al Kassar, an inmate at the Federal Correctional Institution in Terre Haute,
Indiana, alleges in this petition for writ of habeas corpus that he is being prevented from
communicating with his co-defendant despite an order of the United States District Court for the
Nothern District of Alabama that he be allowed to do so.
Habeas corpus review is available only Awhere the deprivation of rights is such that it
necessarily impacts the fact or length of detention.@ Leamer v. Fauver, 288 F.3d 532, 540 (3d
Cir. 2002). This means, in part, that a challenge to the conditions of confinement may not be
brought pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ' 2241. Graham v. Broglin, 922 F.2d 379, 381 (7th Cir. 1991);
Falcon v. U.S. Bureau of Prisons, 52 F.3d 137, 138-39 (7th Cir. 1995).
Because Kassar’s petition for writ of habeas corpus challenges the conditions of his
confinement, not the fact or length of his detention, his habeas petition is summarily dismissed.
II.
Judgment consistent with this Entry shall now issue.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
06/03/2013
Date: __________________
_______________________________
Distribution:
Monzer Al Kassar
61111-054
Terre Haute FCI
P.O. Box 33
Terre Haute, IN 47808
Hon. Jane Magnus-Stinson, Judge
United States District Court
Southern District of Indiana
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?