CUMBERLANDER v. OLIVER

Filing 4

Entry Discussing Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus - The habeas petition shows on its face that he is not entitled to the relief he seeks. Judgment dismissing this action without prejudice shall now issue. (See Entry.) Copy to petitioner via US Mail. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 7/11/2013.(RSF)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA TERRE HAUTE DIVISION DAYDREN CUMBERLANDER, Petitioner, v. JOHN C. OLIVER, Warden, Respondent. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 2:13-cv210-JMS-MJD Entry Discussing Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus “Federal courts are authorized to dismiss summarily any habeas petition that appears legally insufficient on its face.” McFarland v. Scott, 512 U.S. 849, 856 (1994). This is an appropriate case for such a disposition. This conclusion is compelled by the following facts and circumstances: 1. Daydren Cumberlander is confined at a federal prison in this District and seeks habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ' 2241(c)(3) based on his contention that the Federal Bureau of Prisons (“BOP”) has improperly retained him in a prison rather than a communitybased halfway house. 2. The pivotal point for the present is determining what remedy is authorized and appropriate for Cumberlander’s challenge. As noted in Jasperson v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, 460 F.Supp.2d 76, 81 (D.D.C. 2006), the Seventh Circuit has held that habeas is not an available remedy in this context, but rather that prisoners must bring civil actions utilizing the Administrative Procedures Act. This was determined in Richmond v. Scibana, 387 F.3d 602 (7th Cir. 2004), and is fatal to Cumberlander’s claim here. 3. Cumberlander’s habeas petition shows on its face that he is not entitled to the relief he seeks. Judgment dismissing this action without prejudice shall now issue. IT IS SO ORDERED. 07/11/2013 Date:__________________ Distribution: Daydren Cumberlander 67753-061 United States Penitentiary P.O. Box 33 Terre Haute, IN 47808 _______________________________ Hon. Jane Magnus-Stinson, Judge United States District Court Southern District of Indiana

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?