COLLIER v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
MARGINAL ENTRY denying as moot Nephcare's 102 Motion for Summary Judgment - SEE ENTRY. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 6/22/2017.(JRB)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA
TERRE HAUTE DIVISION
JOHN F. CARAWAY, LEANN LaRIVA,
Dr. THOMAS BAILEY,
NAPHCARE US, INC.,
Case No. 2:14-cv-00365-JMS-MJD
In light of Naphcare US, Inc's dismissal from
this case, [see Filing No. 136; Filing No. 137],
the Court DENIES AS MOOT Naphcare's
Motion for Summary Judgment, [Filing No.
June 22, 2017
Distribution via CM/ECF
DEFENDANT NAPHCARE INC.’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
The Defendant, NaphCare, Inc., by Counsel, respectfully moves the Court for Summary
Judgment on all claims filed by the Plaintiff, Anthony Collier.
As shown by the pleadings, by the evidence tendered in support of this motion, and by
the undisputed facts and arguments contained in Defendant’s Brief in Support of Its Motion for
Summary Judgment, there are no genuine issues as to any material facts, and the Defendant is
entitled to judgment as a matter of law.
WHEREFORE, the Defendant, NaphCare, Inc., respectfully moves the Court to enter
Summary Judgment in its favor and against the Plaintiff, Anthony Collier.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?