COLLIER v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al

Filing 147

MARGINAL ENTRY denying as moot Nephcare's 102 Motion for Summary Judgment - SEE ENTRY. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 6/22/2017.(JRB)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA TERRE HAUTE DIVISION ANTHONY COLLIER, Plaintiff, vs. JOHN F. CARAWAY, LEANN LaRIVA, Dr. THOMAS BAILEY, GENEVIEVE DAUGHTERY. CRISTIANA DESMITH, HOLLIE BOWMAN, NAPHCARE US, INC., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 2:14-cv-00365-JMS-MJD In light of Naphcare US, Inc's dismissal from this case, [see Filing No. 136; Filing No. 137], the Court DENIES AS MOOT Naphcare's Motion for Summary Judgment, [Filing No. 102]. JMS, CJ June 22, 2017 Distribution via CM/ECF DEFENDANT NAPHCARE INC.’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT The Defendant, NaphCare, Inc., by Counsel, respectfully moves the Court for Summary Judgment on all claims filed by the Plaintiff, Anthony Collier. As shown by the pleadings, by the evidence tendered in support of this motion, and by the undisputed facts and arguments contained in Defendant’s Brief in Support of Its Motion for Summary Judgment, there are no genuine issues as to any material facts, and the Defendant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. WHEREFORE, the Defendant, NaphCare, Inc., respectfully moves the Court to enter Summary Judgment in its favor and against the Plaintiff, Anthony Collier.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?