ROSALES v. CORIZON, INC. et al

Filing 194

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for [178, 179, 180, and 182] Defendants are directed to comply with any remaining terms of the parties' settlement agreement, and thereafter notify the Court of such compliance, at which time this matter will be dismissed with prejudice. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 4/4/2018.(CBU)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA TERRE HAUTE DIVISION OSCAR ROSALES, Plaintiff, v. CORIZON MEDICAL, INC., et al. Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 2:16-cv-00080-JMS-MJD ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION The Magistrate Judge submitted his Report and Recommendation on Plaintiff’s request to reject the settlement of this matter dkt. [178] and Defendants’ motions to enforce the settlement agreement. Dkts. [179, 180, & 182.] The parties were afforded due opportunity pursuant to statute and the rules of this Court to file objections; none were filed. The Court, having considered the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation, hereby adopts the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation, dkt [192]. Defendants are directed to comply with any remaining terms of the parties’ settlement agreement, and thereafter notify the Court of such compliance, at which time this matter will be dismissed with prejudice. Date: 4/4/2018 Distribution: OSCAR ROSALES 194882 WABASH VALLEY - CF WABASH VALLEY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY - Inmate Mail/Parcels Electronic Service Participant – Court Only David A. Arthur OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL David.Arthur@atg.in.gov Douglass R. Bitner KATZ KORIN CUNNINGHAM, P.C. dbitner@kkclegal.com Jeb Adam Crandall BLEEKE DILLON CRANDALL ATTORNEYS jeb@bleekedilloncrandall.com David C. Dickmeyer INDIANA ATTORNEY GENERAL David.Dickmeyer@atg.in.gov Adriana Katzen BLEEKE DILLON CRANDALL, PC adriana@bleekedilloncrandall.com Maureen E. Ward WOODEN & MCLAUGHLIN LLP (Indianapolis) maureen.ward@woodenmclaughlin.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?