HUERTA v. EWING et al
Filing
67
MARGINAL ENTRY denying as moot 12 Motion for Preliminary Injunction - Because Plaintiffs have filed an Amended Motion for Preliminary Injunction, 65 , their Motion for Preliminary Injunction, 12 , is DENIED AS MOOT AND WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 8/18/2017. (JRB)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA
TERRE HAUTE DIVISION
Jauston Huerta, Durand Randle,
Carl Sherb, Thomas Bolton, Jr.,
Curtis Gillie, Derek Hicks,
Individually And On Behalf Of The
Present And Future Inmates Of
Vigo County Jail,
Plaintiffs,
vs.
GREG EWING, Individually
And In His Official Capacity As
Sheriff of Vigo County; The
VIGO COUNTY COMMISSIONERS:
Brad Anderson, Judy Anderson,
and Jon Marvel, In Their Official
Capacity; The VIGO COUNTY
COUNCIL: Mike Morris, Mark D. Bird,
Rick Burger, Timothy Curley,
Kathy Miller, Ed Ping, and Bill Thomas
In Their Official Capacity,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CAUSE NO. 2:16-cv-397-JMS-DKL
Because Plaintiffs have filed an
Amended Motion for Preliminary
Injunction, [Filing No. 65], their
Motion for Preliminary Injunction,
[Filing No. 12], is DENIED AS
MOOT
AND
WITHOUT
PREJUDICE.
JMS, CJ
August 18, 2017
Distribution via ECF only to all
counsel of record
PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
Comes now the Plaintiffs, by counsel, and pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65
respectfully move for a preliminary injunction, specifically requesting that this Court enjoin
Greg Ewing as the Sheriff of Vigo County, the Vigo County Commissioners, and the Vigo
County Council from continuing to overcrowd, underfund, and understaff the Vigo County Jail,
and in support thereof, state as follows:
1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?