YOSHIIKE et al v. McCONER et al

Filing 86

ENTRY and Order for final pretrial conference held before Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 10/5/2010: Parties appear by counsel. Defendant Mitsui Management's, Motion in Limine (Dkt. 48 ) is GRANTED. Plaintiffs, Manabu Yoshiike and Takako Yoshiike& #039;s Motion in Limine (Dkt. 55 ) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Plaintiffs, Manabu Yoshiike and Takako Yoshiike's Additional Motion in Limine (Dkt. 77 ) is TAKEN UNDER ADVISEMENT. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt. (See Order for further details) (Court Reporter Fred Pratt.)(TRG)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA NEW ALBANY DIVISION MANABU YOSHIIKE, TAKAKO YOSHIIKE, Plaintiffs, vs. KIRK B. McCONER, MITSUI SUMITOMO MARINE MANAGEMENT (U.S.A), INC., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) NO. 4:09-cv-00114-TWP-WGH ) ) ) ) ) ) ENTRY AND ORDER Parties appeared for a final pretrial conference in this matter on October 5, 2010. Plaintiff appears by counsel, Roger L. Pardieck. Defendant, Mitsui Sumitomo Marine Management (U.S.A.), Inc. appears by counsel, Mary Kaye Reeder and Jessica Ann Moland. The parties informed the Court that they will attempt to agree to and submit stipulations of fact prior to trial. The Court reviewed the parties' lists of witnesses to determine who will testify and the subjects of their testimony. The Court reviewed the lists of exhibits and heard argument on the defendant's objection to plaintiff's proposed exhibit 41. The Court heard argument from counsel on the parties' motions in limine and made rulings on the record and the plaintiff's "additional" motion in limine was taken under advisement. The Court will issue written Orders on all of the motions in limine. The Court discussed the voir dire procedure and took under advisement the plaintiff's request to conduct 30 minutes of voir dire examination. The parties are to provide the Court with their proposed preliminary instructions by October 12, 2010 and the Court will provide its proposed preliminary instructions next week. The Court discussed proposed final instructions with the parties. The Court Reporter was Fred Pratt. The Court made the following rulings on the record: (1). Defendant Mitsui Management's, Motion in Limine (Dkt. 48) is GRANTED as per the Court's written order. (2). Plaintiffs, Manabu Yoshiike and Takako Yoshiike's Motion in Limine (Dkt. 55) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part; as per the Court's written order. (3). Plaintiffs, Manabu Yoshiike and Takako Yoshiike's Additional Motion in Limine (Dkt. 77) is TAKEN UNDER ADVISEMENT and the Court will issue a written ruling. (4.) The Court ORDERS the parties to confer once rulings are issued on the additional Motions in Limine (Dkt. 55) and the Objection to Exhibit 41. The parties have agreed to make one final attempt at settlement with the Magistrate. (5). The Court TAKES UNDER ADVISEMENT the Defendant's Motion to Exclude Expert Witness Testimony (Dkt. 80). Plaintiff to file a response by October 12, 2010. (6). (7). The Court will seat eight (8) jurors. Each party may use three peremptory strikes. Each party is allowed thirty (30) minutes for opening statements and sixty (60) minutes for closing argument. The jury trial is scheduled to last for three (3) days. (8). The Jury Trial in this matter remains set for Monday, October 18, 2010, at 9:00 a.m., in Courtroom 344, Birch Bayh Federal Building and United States Courthouse, 46 East Ohio Street, Indianapolis, Indiana. Counsel are to arrive at 8:30 a.m. the first day of trial. The Court confirmed that, other than the first day, Court would commence at 9:00 a.m. and run through 4:00 p.m., with two fifteen minute breaks and a lunch hour at approximately 12:00 p.m. IT IS SO ORDERED. 10/07/2010 Date: _______________ ________________________ Hon. Tanya Walton Pratt, Judge United States District Court Southern District of Indiana Distribution to: Roger L. Pardieck THE PARDIECK LAW FIRM rlp@pardiecklaw.com Mary Kaye Reeder RILEY BENNETT & EGLOFF LLP mreeder@rbelaw.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?