YOSHIIKE et al v. McCONER et al
ORDER in Limine Regarding Statements From the "Chairman" - The 48 Motion in limine regarding statements from the Chairman is meritorious and should be granted. Plaintiff, Plaintiff's witnesses and Plaintiff's counsel are prohibited from referring to or discussing any alleged hearsay statements of the "Chairman." Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 10/7/2010.(TRG)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA NEW ALBANY DIVISION MANABU YOSHIIKE and TAKAKO YOSHIIKE, ) ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) vs. ) ) KIRK B. MCCONER and ) MITSUI SUMITOMO MARINE ) MANAGEMENT (U.S.A.), INC., ) ) Defendants. )
CAUSE NO. 4:09-cv-114 TWP-WGH
ORDER IN LIMINE REGARDING STATEMENTS FROM THE "CHAIRMAN" Defendant, Mitsui Sumitomo Marine Insurance Company, by counsel, moved the
Court to exclude testimony of alleged statements made by the "Chairman" of plaintiff's former parent company (Dkt. No. 48). Testimony that Plaintiff had a conversation with the "Chairman" of the parent company wherein the "Chairman" told Plaintiff he was inadequately performing his job and that he must retire, constitutes inadmissible hearsay. The Motion in limine regarding statements from the Chairman is meritorious and should be granted. IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Plaintiff, Plaintiff's witnesses and Plaintiff's counsel are prohibited from referring to or discussing any alleged hearsay statements of the "Chairman." Dated: 10/07/2010 Judge, United States District Court Hon. Tanya Walton Pratt, Judge Southern District of Indiana United New Albany Division States District Court
Southern District of Indiana
Copies to: Mary K. Reeder mreederArbelaw.com Roger L. Pardieck rlpApardiecklaw.com
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?