BLEVINS v. GAMING ENTERTAINMENT (INDIANA) LLC et al

Filing 6

ENTRY ON JURISDICTION - Plaintiff is ORDERED to file a Supplemental Jurisdictional Statement that establishes the Court's jurisdiction over this case. This statement should specifically identify the citizenship of the parties. This jurisdictional statement is due fourteen (14) days from the date of this Entry. See Entry for details. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 5/15/2017. (MAT)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA NEW ALBANY DIVISION TAMMY BLEVINS, Plaintiff, v. GAMING ENTERTAINMENT (INDIANA) LLC doing business as RISING STAR CASINO RESORT, FULL HOUSE RESORTS, INC. doing business as RISING STAR CASINO RESORT, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 4:17-cv-00083-TWP-TAB ENTRY ON JURISDICTION It has come to the Court’s attention that Plaintiff’s Complaint fails to allege all of the facts necessary to determine whether the Court has subject matter jurisdiction over this case. The Complaint alleges jurisdiction based upon diversity of citizenship. However, the Complaint fails to sufficiently allege the citizenship of the parties. Citizenship is the operative consideration for jurisdictional purposes. See Meyerson v. Harrah’s East Chicago Casino, 299 F.3d 616, 617 (7th Cir. 2002) (“residence and citizenship are not synonyms and it is the latter that matters for purposes of the diversity jurisdiction”). The Complaint alleges “Plaintiff, Tammy Blevins, is and at all times pertinent hereto was a resident of the state of Kentucky and presently resides at 520 Rose Creek Drive, Radcliff, Kentucky 40160.” (Filing No. 1 at 2.) The allegation of residency, rather than citizenship, is insufficient to allow the Court to determine whether diversity jurisdiction exists. Additionally, the citizenship of a corporation is “both the state of incorporation and the state in which the corporation has its principal place of business.” Westfield Ins. Co. v. Kuhns, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 138262, at *3 (S.D. Ind. Nov. 30, 2011). The Complaint asserts: Defendant, Full House Resort, Inc. d/b/a Rising Star Casino Resort, is and at all times pertinent hereto was Delaware Corporation with a principal place of business located at 4670 S. Ft. Apache Rd, Suite 190, Las Vegas, Nevada 89147, and operates a casino resort located at 777 Rising Star Drive, Rising Sun, Indiana 47040. (Filing No. 1 at 2.) This jurisdictional allegation does not establish the citizenship of Defendant Full House Resort, Inc., because it fails to allege the state of incorporation. Further, “[f]or diversity jurisdiction purposes, the citizenship of an LLC is the citizenship of each of its members.” Thomas v. Guardsmark, LLC, 487 F.3d 531, 534 (7th Cir. 2007). “Consequently, an LLC’s jurisdictional statement must identify the citizenship of each of its members as of the date the complaint or notice of removal was filed, and, if those members have members, the citizenship of those members as well.” Id. The Complaint states “Defendant, Gaming Entertainment (Indiana) LLC d/b/a Rising Star Casino Resort is and at all times pertinent hereto was a Nevada Limited Liability Company with a principal place of business located at 4670 S. Ft. Apache Rd, Suite 190, Las Vegas, Nevada 89147, and operates a casino resort located at 777 Rising Star Drive, Rising Sun, Indiana 47040.” (Filing No. 1 at 2.) This jurisdictional allegation does not establish the citizenship of Defendant Gaming Entertainment, LLC. Alleging the identity and citizenship of each of the members of the Defendant limited liability company is necessary for this Court to determine whether it has jurisdiction. Plaintiff is ORDERED to file a Supplemental Jurisdictional Statement that establishes the Court’s jurisdiction over this case. This statement should specifically identify the citizenship of the parties. This jurisdictional statement is due fourteen (14) days from the date of this Entry. SO ORDERED. Date: 5/15/2017 2 Distribution: Rheanne D. Falkner MILLER & FALKNER rfalkner@millerfalknerlaw.com 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?