HAINES v. FREEMAN et al

Filing 62

ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT, SCREENING AMENDED COMPLAINT, DIRECTING ISSUANCE OF PROCESS, DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, AND DIRECTING FURTHER PROCEEDINGS - Jarel Haines' unopposed motion for leave to file an amended complaint, dkt. 40 , is granted. The clerk is directed to docket the proposed amended complaint, dkt. 40-1, as the amended complaint. The clerk is directed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(c)(3) to iss ue process to Defendant Justin Ponsler in the manner specified by Rule 4(d). Process shall consist of the amended complaint (dkt. [40-1]), applicable forms (Notice of Lawsuit and Request for Waiver of Service of Summons and Waiver of Service of Summons), and this Entry. Evan Ponsler has already appeared in the action and will receive notice of the amended complaint electronically. If Mr. Haines believes he asserted claims in the amended complaint that the Court has not addressed, he sh all have through December 11, 2020, to notify the Court. The defendants' motion for summary judgment, dkt. 45 , is denied without prejudice, and Mr. Haines' motion for extension of time, dkt. 56 , is denied as moot. The clerk is direc ted to add Justin Ponsler as a defendant and terminate Jason Bliton as a defendant. Claims against Mr. Bliton are dismissed. The defendants shall answer the amended complaint in the time required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(a)(1)(A). Th e parties shall have through February 12, 2021, to complete (or supplement) portions I(A)-(E) of the pretrial schedule at dkt. 28 . The parties shall have through March 31, 2021, to complete discovery, and through April 30, 2021, to file dispositive motions (See Order). Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 11/16/2020 (Copies mailed per distribution list).(TMC)

Case 4:19-cv-00165-TWP-DML Document 62 Filed 11/16/20 Page 1 of 4 PageID #: 250

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA
NEW ALBANY DIVISION
JAREL T. HAINES,
Plaintiff,
v.
JASON BLITON, et al.
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

No. 4:19-cv-00165-TWP-DML

ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AMENDED
COMPLAINT, SCREENING AMENDED COMPLAINT, DIRECTING
ISSUANCE OF PROCESS, DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE MOTION FOR
SUMMARY JUDGMENT, AND DIRECTING FURTHER PROCEEDINGS
This matter is before the Court on Jarel Haines' motion for leave to file an amended
complaint. Because the Court grants Mr. Haines' motion, it also screens the amended complaint,
directs issuance of process on the new defendant, denies without prejudice the defendants' motion
for summary judgment, and issues a schedule to proceed toward the conclusion of the matter.
I. Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint
Jarel Haines' unopposed motion for leave to file an amended complaint, dkt. [40], is
granted. The clerk is directed to docket the proposed amended complaint, dkt. 40-1, as the
amended complaint.
II. Screening
Mr. Haines is a prisoner at Pendleton Correctional Facility. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
§ 1915A(b), the Court must dismiss the amended complaint if it is frivolous or malicious, fails to
state a claim for relief, or seeks monetary relief against a defendant who is immune from such
relief. In determining whether the amended complaint states a claim, the Court applies the same

Case 4:19-cv-00165-TWP-DML Document 62 Filed 11/16/20 Page 2 of 4 PageID #: 251

standard as when addressing a motion to dismiss under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6).
See Cesal v. Moats, 851 F.3d 714, 720 (7th Cir. 2017). To survive dismissal,
[the second amended] complaint must contain sufficient factual matter, accepted as
true, to state a claim for relief that is plausible on its face. A claim has facial
plausibility when the plaintiff pleads factual content that allows the court to draw
the reasonable inference that the defendant is liable for the misconduct alleged.
Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009). Mr. Haines' pro se pleading is construed liberally and
held to a less stringent standard than formal pleadings drafted by lawyers. Perez v. Fenoglio, 792
F.3d 768, 776 (7th Cir. 2015).
The amended complaint describes an incident that occurred on July 8, 2019, while
Mr. Haines was a pretrial detainee at the Jennings County Jail. The defendants are two Jail
employees, Evan and Justin Ponsler. Mr. Haines alleges that the defendants attacked him without
justification. Based on these allegations, the action shall proceed with Fourteenth Amendment
force claims against Evan and Justin Ponsler pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.
III. Issuance of Process
The clerk is directed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(c)(3) to issue process
to Defendant Justin Ponsler in the manner specified by Rule 4(d). Process shall consist of the
amended complaint (dkt. [40-1]), applicable forms (Notice of Lawsuit and Request for Waiver of
Service of Summons and Waiver of Service of Summons), and this Entry. Evan Ponsler has already
appeared in the action and will receive notice of the amended complaint electronically.
IV. Motion for Summary Judgment
The defendants' motion for summary judgment, dkt. [45], is denied without prejudice,
and Mr. Haines' motion for extension of time, dkt. [56], is denied as moot.

Case 4:19-cv-00165-TWP-DML Document 62 Filed 11/16/20 Page 3 of 4 PageID #: 252

V. Conclusion and Further Proceedings
Jarel Haines' unopposed motion for leave to file an amended complaint, dkt. [40], is
granted. The clerk is directed to docket the proposed amended complaint, dkt. [40-1], as the
amended complaint.
The action shall proceed with Fourteenth Amendment force claims against Evan and
Justin Ponsler pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. These are the only claims identified by the Court. If
Mr. Haines believes he asserted claims in the amended complaint that the Court has not addressed,
he shall have through December 11, 2020, to notify the Court.
The clerk is directed to add Justin Ponsler as a defendant and terminate Jason Bliton as
a defendant. Mr. Haines opted not to include Mr. Bliton as a defendant in his amended complaint.
See dkt. 40-1 at 4 ("These men was not ordered to attack me by Jason Bliton . . . ."). Claims against
Mr. Bliton are dismissed.
The defendants shall answer the amended complaint in the time required by Federal Rule
of Civil Procedure 12(a)(1)(A). The parties shall have through February 12, 2021, to complete
(or supplement) portions I(A)–(E) of the pretrial schedule at dkt. 28. The parties shall have
through March 31, 2021, to complete discovery, and through April 30, 2021, to file dispositive
motions.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

Date:

11/16/2020

Case 4:19-cv-00165-TWP-DML Document 62 Filed 11/16/20 Page 4 of 4 PageID #: 253

Distribution:
JAREL T. HAINES
933623
PENDLETON - CF
PENDLETON CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Inmate Mail/Parcels
4490 West Reformatory Road
PENDLETON, IN 46064
Caren L. Pollack
POLLACK LAW FIRM, P.C.
[e-mail]
Justin Ponsler
Jennings County Sheriff's Office
925 S. State St.
North Vernon, Indiana 47265