BVS, Inc v. CDW Direct, LLC et al

Filing 112

ORDER: The Clerk of Court is directed to enter an amended judgment that reflects judgment in favor of CDW and against BVS on BVS's 38 Complaint and dismissal without prejudice of CDW's 41 Third Party Complaint against Arrow Electronics, Inc., TSSLink, Inc., and Net App, Inc. Signed by Chief Judge Linda R Reade on 4/2/2013. (skm)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA CEDAR RAPIDS DIVISION BVS, INC., Plaintiff, No. 11-CV-79-LRR vs. ORDER CDW DIRECT, LLC, Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff, vs. ARROW ELECTRONICS, INC., TSSLINK, INC. and NET APP, INC., Third-Party Defendants. __________________________________ NET APP, INC., Counter Claimant, vs. CDW DIRECT, LLC, Counter Defendant. ____________________ The matter before the court is the court’s March 28, 2013 Order (docket no. 109). Pursuant to such order, the court resolved BVS, Inc.’s (“BVS”) claims in favor of CDW Direct, LLC (“CDW”) and directed the Clerk of Court to enter judgment accordingly. See Judgment (docket no. 110). Because CDW’s Third-Party Complaint (docket no. 41) against Arrow Electronics, Inc., TSSLink, Inc. and Net App, Inc. was necessarily contingent on BVS prevailing against CDW, the court finds that it is appropriate to dismiss without prejudice CDW’s Third-Party Complaint. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter an amended judgment that reflects judgment in favor of CDW and against BVS on BVS’s Complaint (docket no. 38) and dismissal without prejudice of CDW’s Third-Party Complaint (docket no. 41) against Arrow Electronics, Inc., TSSLink, Inc. and Net App, Inc. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED this 2nd day of April, 2013.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?