Smithco Manufacturing Inc v. Haldex Brake Products Corporation

Filing 39

ORDER - Granting 38 Resisted Motion for Voluntary Dismissal of Negligence Claim filed by SmithCo Manufacturing Inc., the plaintiff's negligence claim is dismissed with prejudice. Furthermore, the supplemental briefing required by the court's Order (docket 37 ), filed March 11, 2010, is now moot, and the parties are no longer required to file any supplemental briefs. Signed by Judge Mark W Bennett on 03/24/2010. (src).

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA WESTERN DIVISION SMITHCO MANUFACTURING, INC., Plaintiff, vs. HALDEX BRAKE PRODUCTS CORPORATION, Defendant. ____________________ This case is before the court on the plaintiff's March 24, 2010, Motion For Voluntary Dismissal Of Negligence Claim (docket no. 38). The plaintiff asserts that it is appropriate to dismiss its negligence claim, because the plaintiff believes that this case more properly sounds in warranty, and the plaintiff consents to dismissal of its negligence claim with prejudice. The plaintiff represents that the defendant will not consent to voluntary dismissal of the negligence claim, because the court has ordered supplemental briefing on that claim. The court finds good cause for dismissing the negligence claim. THEREFORE, the plaintiff's March 24, 2010, Motion For Voluntary Dismissal Of Negligence Claim (docket no. 38) is granted and the plaintiff's negligence claim is dismissed with prejudice. FURTHERMORE, the supplemental briefing required by the court's Order (docket no. 37), filed March 11, 2010, is now moot, and the parties are no longer required to file any supplemental briefs. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED this 24th day of March, 2010. No. C 09-4016-MWB ORDER DISMISSING PLAINTIFF'S NEGLIGENCE CLAIM WITH PREJUDICE __________________________________ MARK W. BENNETT U. S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?