Sprint Communications Company LP v. Vonage Holdings Corp., et al

Filing 120

MOTION for Leave to file Sprint's Sur-Reply to Vonage's Reply in Support of Vonage's Motion to Compel (Doc 107) by Plaintiff Sprint Communications Company LP. (Attachments: # 1 Sprint's Sur-Reply# 2 Exhibit A# 3 Exhibit B# 4 Exhibit C# 5 Exhibit D# 6 Exhibit E# 7 Exhibit F) (Seitz, Adam)

Sprint Communications Company LP v. Vonage Holdings Corp., et al

Doc. 120

Case 2:05-cv-02433-JWL

Document 120

Filed 02/12/2007

Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY L.P., Plaintiff, v. VONAGE HOLDINGS CORP., VONAGE AMERICA, INC., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case No. 05-2433-JWL

PLAINTIFF SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY L.P.'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A SUR-REPLY TO VONAGE'S REPLY IN SUPPORT OF VONAGE'S MOTION TO COMPEL Plaintiff Sprint Communications Company L.P. ("Sprint") respectfully moves for leave to file a sur-reply to Vonage's Reply in Support of Vonage's Motion to Compel. Sprint's proposed Sur-reply is attached hereto as Exhibit A. Leave to file a sur-reply may be granted when a party "improperly raises new arguments in a reply." Pehr v. Rubbermaid, Inc. 87 F.Supp. 2d 1222, 1236 (D. Kan. 2000). Vonage's Reply raises new arguments that mischaracterize Sprint's discovery efforts. Sprint's Sur-reply is limited to correcting the record with respect to the inaccuracies and unsupported inferences advanced by Vonage in its Reply. WHEREFORE, Sprint respectfully requests leave to present and file with this Court the accompanying Sur-reply addressing the foregoing issues.

-12327740v1

Dockets.Justia.com

Case 2:05-cv-02433-JWL

Document 120

Filed 02/12/2007

Page 2 of 2

Respectfully submitted, Dated: February 12, 2007 _/s/ Adam P. Seitz___________________ B. Trent Webb, KS Bar No. 15965 Eric A. Buresh, KS Bar No. 19895 Adam P. Seitz, KS Bar No. 21059 SHOOK, HARDY & BACON L.L.P. 2555 Grand Boulevard Kansas City, Missouri 64108-2613 [phone] Telephone [phone] Facsimile Attorneys for Plaintiff SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY L.P.

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on this 12th day of February, 2007, a true and accurate copy of the above and foregoing PLAINTIFF SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY L.P.'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE SUR-REPLY TO VONAGE'S REPLY IN SUPPORT OF VONAGE'S MOTION TO COMPEL was e-filed with the Court, which sent notice to the following: Don R. Lolli Patrick J. Kaine Dysart Taylor Lay Cotter & McMonigle P.C. 4420 Madison Avenue Kansas City, Missouri 64111 Patrick D. McPherson Patrick C. Muldoon Barry Golob Duane Morris LLP 1667 K. Street N.W. Washington, DC 20006-1608 Attorneys for Defendants Vonage Holdings Corp. and Vonage America, Inc. _/s/ _Adam P. Seitz___________________________ Attorneys for Sprint Communications Company L.P.

-22327740v1