Sprint Communications Company LP v. Vonage Holdings Corp., et al

Filing 168

ORDER denying 156 Defendants' Motion to Amend Scheduling Order. The motion is denied on grounds that Defendants have failed to show sufficient good cause for the proposed amendments. Accordingly, and as specifically discussed during the conference, all outstanding discovery must be completed by May 1, 2007. As also discussed at the conference, if counsel are unable to reach agreement on dates for previously agreed upon depositions, the deposing party shall unilaterally issue notices for such depositions in order to complete them prior to the May 1, 2007 deadline. Any Reply brief in support of Plaintiffs Motion to Compel Privilege Log (doc. 134) shall be filed no later than April 17, 2007. Any Reply brief in support of Plaintiffs Motion to Compel Financial Documents (doc. 137)shall be filed no later than April 17, 2007. Any Reply brief in support of Defendants Motion to Compel Christie Documents (doc. 146) shall be filed no later than April 19, 2007. Any Reply brief in support of Defendants Motion to Amend Answer and Counterclaims (doc. 148) shall be filed no later than April 19, 2007. Any Reply brief in support of Defendants Motion to Compel 30(b)(6) Testimony (doc. 150) shall be filed no later than April 19, 2007. Signed by Magistrate Judge David J. Waxse on 4/16/2007.(jm)

Sprint Communications Company LP v. Vonage Holdings Corp., et al

Doc. 168

Case 2:05-cv-02433-JWL

Document 168

Filed 04/16/2007

Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY LP, Plaintiff, v. VONAGE HOLDINGS CORP., et al., Defendants. ORDER A status conference was held in this matter on April 13, 2007. Plaintiff appeared through counsel Trent Webb, Adam Seitz, and Eric Buresh. Defendant s appeared through counsel Donald McPhail and Barry Golob. Upon consideration of the briefs filed by the parties in conjunction with Defendants' Motion to Amend Scheduling Order, and pursuant to discussion at the conference, the Court hereby enters the following order: 1. Defendants' Motion to Amend Scheduling Order (doc. 156) is denied on grounds that Defendants have failed to show sufficient good cause for the proposed amendments. Accordingly, and as specifically discussed during the conference, all outstanding discovery must be completed by May 1, 2007. As also discussed at the conference, if counsel are unable to reach agreement on dates for previously agreed upon depositions, the deposing party shall unilaterally issue notices for such depositions in order to complete them prior to the May 1, 2007 deadline. 2. 3. 4. Any Reply brief in support of Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Privilege Log (doc. 134) shall be filed no later than April 17, 2007. Any Reply brief in support of Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Financial Documents (doc. 137) shall be filed no later than April 17, 2007. Any Reply brief in support of Defendants' Motion to Compel Christie Documents (doc. 146) shall be filed no later than April 19, 2007. Case No. 05-2433-JWL-DJW

Dockets.Justia.com

Case 2:05-cv-02433-JWL

Document 168

Filed 04/16/2007

Page 2 of 2

5. 6.

Any Reply brief in support of Defendants' Motion to Amend Answer and Counterclaims (doc. 148) shall be filed no later than April 19, 2007. Any Reply brief in support of Defendants' Motion to Compel 30(b)(6) Testimony (doc. 150) shall be filed no later than April 19, 2007.

IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated in Kansas City, Kansas on this 16th day of April, 2007. /s David J. Waxse David J. Waxse United States Magistrate Judge cc: All counsel and pro se parties

2