Sprint Communications Company LP v. Vonage Holdings Corp., et al

Filing 17

ORDER granting 9 , 10 , and 11 Motions to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Attorneys James W. Dabney, Malcolm J. Duncan, and Henry C. Lebowitz are granted leave to appear pro hac vice on behalf of theglobe.com, Inc. and Voiceglo Holdings, Inc.. If pro hac vice counsel has not already done so, counsel is directed to immediately register for electronic notification pursuant to the court's Administrative Procedures by completing a registration form at www.ksd.uscourts.gov/features/forms/pdfforms/efilereg.pdf. Signed by Magistrate Judge David J. Waxse on 11/04/05. (mg)

Download PDF
Sprint Communications Company LP v. Vonage Holdings Corp., et al Doc. 17 Case 2:05-cv-02433-JWL Document 17 Filed 11/04/2005 Page 1 of 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS CO., LP, Plaintiff, v. theglobe.com, INC., et al., Defendants. No. 05-2433-JWL-DJW ORDER GRANTING MOTIONS FOR LEAVE TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE Having considered the three Motions For Leave To Appear Pro Hac Vice filed on November 2, 2005 (docs. 9, 10, and 11), and for good cause shown, the Court finds that said motions should be sustained and that James W. Dabney, Malcolm J. Duncan, and Henry C. Lebowitz should be and hereby are admitted to practice in the United States District Court for the District of Kansas for purposes of this case only. If pro hac vice counsel have not already done so, counsel are directed to immediately register for electronic notification pursuant to the Court's Administrative Procedures by completing registration forms at www.ksd.uscourts.gov/features/forms/pdfforms/efilereg.pdf. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated in Kansas City, Kansas on this 4th day of November, 2005. s/ David J. Waxse David J. Waxse United States Magistrate Judge cc: All counsel and pro se parties Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?