Sprint Communications Company LP v. Vonage Holdings Corp., et al

Filing 290

OBJECTION(S) to 281 Designation of Depositions and Counter-Designations by Vonage America, Inc., Vonage Holdings Corp.. (Theisen, Catherine)

Sprint Communications Company LP v. Vonage Holdings Corp., et al

Doc. 290

Case 2:05-cv-02433-JWL

Document 290

Filed 08/17/2007

Page 1 of 12

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS __________________________________________ ) SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY, L.P., ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) Case No. 05-2433-JWL v. ) ) VONAGE HOLDINGS CORP. AND ) VONAGE AMERICA, INC., ) Defendants. ) __________________________________________) VONAGE HOLDINGS CORP. AND VONAGE AMERICA, INC.'S COUNTERDESIGNATIONS AND OBJECTIONS TO PLAINTIFF'S DESIGNATIONS OF DEPOSITION AND TRIAL TESTIMONY Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 26 and 32, and the orders of this Court, Defendants Vonage Holdings Corp. and Vonage America, Inc. (collectively "Vonage"), respectfully submit the following counter-designations and objections to Plaintiff Sprint Communications Company L.P.'s designations of deposition and trial testimony. Vonage reserves the right to supplement its counter-designations and objections, including but not limited to the depositions of John Garcia, Ben Vos and any remaining deposition(s) of Sprint under Rule 30(b)(6). (1) Jeffrey Citron (March 22, 2007) 53:2-55:21 67:5-12 68:15-69:10 69:20-70:4 73:1-10 80:24-81:3 87:2-13 87:25-88:2

Dockets.Justia.com

Case 2:05-cv-02433-JWL

Document 290

Filed 08/17/2007

Page 2 of 12

88:11-14 104:8-13 105:13-107:3 110:1-6 110:21-111:6 113:19-114:8 116:14-117:10 118:16-23 119:22-120:3 120:19-121:10 122:14-123:4 123:19-124:14 125:23-126:3 126:21-127:4 128:7-129:9 130:5-131:1 138:20-139:16 140:20-141:2 150:12-151:6 153:3-155:16 155:18-157:1 161:5-19 167:25-169:24 172:14-25 191:11-192:6 192:19-193:12 Vonage objects to Sprint's designations to the extent that the designated testimony is hearsay, irrelevant, prejudicial, confusing, misleading, and is not based on personal and/or first hand knowledge. (3) Glenn S. Eisen (April 11, 2007) 31:7-20 34:14-19 44:22-46 48:5-21 49:3-7 50:4-20 51:4-52:2 53:5-16 56:18-57:2 58:1-4 62:15-63:12; 64:2-8;

Case 2:05-cv-02433-JWL

Document 290

Filed 08/17/2007

Page 3 of 12

64:14-65:3 70:2-4 70:15-71:5 86:14-87:6 89:19-21 94:9-95:6 99:2-12 100:2-4 101:1-19 102:8-103:20 108:4-109:19 114:11-20 124:19-125:8 133:6-10 134:21-136:21 Vonage objects to Sprint's designations to the extent that the designated testimony is hearsay, irrelevant, prejudicial, confusing, misleading, and is not based on personal and/or first hand knowledge. (4) Chakrapani Gorrepati (April 5, 2007) 18:2-19:6 27:17-19 28:22-29:7 31:16-18 32:1-3 32:13-18 33:14-22 35:21-36:12 36:18-21 37:7-9 42:10-17 44:5-11 46:17-47:7 50:16-20 53:20-21 56:5-12 57:10-18 67:11-17 70:7-10 70:15-22 74:13-21 75:4 75:9 75:15-17

Case 2:05-cv-02433-JWL

Document 290

Filed 08/17/2007

Page 4 of 12

87:16-22 89:15-90:4 Vonage objects to Sprint's designations to the extent that the designated testimony is hearsay, irrelevant, prejudicial, confusing, misleading, and is not based on personal and/or first hand knowledge. (6) Louis A. Mamakos (April 24, 2007) 25:12-17 27:8-15 28:16-22 30:1-7 30:12-15 32:3-13 33:1-11 36:4-12 37:11-21 38:9-39:1 39:6-16 40:1 40:11-12 42:20-43:12 44:12-17 46:1-3 46:17-21 53:3-6 60:8-61:3 62:2-63:1 64:8-11 79:3-8 91:13-92:6 96:12-16 103:12-19 104:6-22 105:9-106:4 108:17-20 109:17-110:6 114:12-115:22 116:10-17 118:14-19 119:12-120:2 124:4-12 129:18 146:21-147:11 159:12-18

Case 2:05-cv-02433-JWL

Document 290

Filed 08/17/2007

Page 5 of 12

168:8-17 170:4-8 179:11-14 179:18-22 182:11-18 186:12-19 187:11-188:2 189:5-16 201:11-14 204:13-21 211:19-213:10 215:8-16 Vonage objects to Sprint's designations to the extent that the designated testimony is hearsay, irrelevant, prejudicial, confusing, misleading, and is not based on personal and/or first hand knowledge.

(7)

Jose Martinez (April 5, 2007) 14:22-15:3 26:16-27:10 40:16-20 53:1-7 68:22-69:9 74:2-19 76:14-16 77:8-9 78:18-79:1 79:10-80:10 83:15-18 85:21 98:9-99:14 99:19-100:2 106:10-18 107:13-20 111:15-19 121:9-22 131:8-133:1 140:22-142:15 142:18-143:2 146:3-8 146:10-16 147:5-150:9 150:22-151:7 151:8-152:3 152:14-19

Case 2:05-cv-02433-JWL

Document 290

Filed 08/17/2007

Page 6 of 12

155:1-16 156:2-9 158:2-160:9 160:11-17 163:20-21 167:21-169:19 180:2-21 182:9-12 183:6-12 184:5-185:5 188:21-189:1 197:3-17 221:20-222:2 Vonage objects to Sprint's designations to the extent that the designated testimony is hearsay, irrelevant, prejudicial, confusing, misleading, and is not based on personal and/or first hand knowledge. Moreover, Vonage specifically objects to the designations at page 13 line 18 through page 14 line 4 and page 14 line 7 through line 21 as this testimony is not based on first hand knowledge and is hearsay. Additionally, Vonage specifically objects to the testimony at page 53 line 9 through line 11 as confusing and misleading and not based on first hand knowledge. (9) Edward Mulligan (April 11, 2007) 38:2-16 57:12-58:8 58:13-59:21 60:13-61:16 62:3-64:22 65:1-65:3 65:10-65:21 67:13 71:20-75:4 75:14-75:15 76:12-76:21 77:13-82:16 85:3-87:2 92:22-94:5 95:20-99:15 100:22-101:5 101:9-106:3 114:4-117:19 119:17-121:4 121:16:121:20 122:11-122:16

Case 2:05-cv-02433-JWL

Document 290

Filed 08/17/2007

Page 7 of 12

139:1-140:16 176:2-178:20 180:8-181:20 183:10-190:11 190:18-191:6 191:13-192:8 194.16-195:15 196:1 Vonage objects to Sprint's designations to the extent that the designated testimony is hearsay, irrelevant, prejudicial, confusing, misleading, and is not based on personal and/or first hand knowledge.

(11)

Daniel Smires (April 5, 2007) 27:14-28:16 29:17-22 30:6-8 34:14-17

Vonage objects to Sprint's designations to the extent that the designated testimony is hearsay, irrelevant, prejudicial, confusing, misleading, and is not based on personal and/or first hand knowledge.

(12)

Michael Tribolet (May 22, 2007) 13:6-15:14 27:15-30:1 32:5-34:1 38:18-39:1 42:18-43:12 77:20-81:15 95:13-95:15 103:15-104:13 105:1-111:1 111:15-111:19 125:1-125:14 127:15-127:20 129:6-129:13 132:7-133:20 163:16-164:6 181:2-182:14 184:18-185:3 185:18-22 187:9-19

Case 2:05-cv-02433-JWL

Document 290

Filed 08/17/2007

Page 8 of 12

Vonage objects to Sprint's designations to the extent that the designated testimony is hearsay, irrelevant, prejudicial, confusing, misleading, and is not based on personal and/or first hand knowledge.

(13)

David Wu (March 20, 2007) 43:1-4 48:22-49:3 51:18-52:7 52:14-54:15 69:7-73:25 75:12-83:1 84:18-86.22 149:13-151:7 165:6-25 168:16-172:13

Vonage objects to Sprint's designations to the extent that the designated testimony is hearsay, irrelevant, prejudicial, confusing, misleading, and is not based on personal and/or first hand knowledge. (15) Jeffrey Citron (Verizon v. Vonage, December 22, 2006), 52:21-55:6 Vonage objects to Sprint's designations to the extent that the designated testimony is hearsay, irrelevant, prejudicial, confusing, misleading, and is not based on personal and/or first hand knowledge. Additionally, Vonage objects to the designations of witness testimony from the Verizon matter for the reasons set forth in Vonage's contemporaneously filed Motion in Limine on this issue. (16) Glenn Eisen (Verizon v. Vonage, October 27, 2006) 16:22-20:5 21:8-20 22:2-13 26:11-28:18 32:16-34:12 41:9-42:1 42:11-42:20 44:7-45:1 45:6-46:17 47:6-21

Case 2:05-cv-02433-JWL

Document 290

Filed 08/17/2007

Page 9 of 12

92:12-22 94:19-22 95:16-22 97:3-16 98:6-99:12 101:5-103:3 103:9-104:11 107:18-20 108:3-8 108:17-110:11 112:19-113:5 121:8-122:4 126:22-129:21 137:5-9 139:5-14 142:17-144:16 154:14-155:2 172:1-176:3 181:8-15 181:22-184:1 189:1-191:10 192:18-194:21 195:11-198:13 200:12-202:3 Vonage objects to Sprint's designations to the extent that the designated testimony is hearsay, irrelevant, prejudicial, confusing, misleading, and is not based on personal and/or first hand knowledge. Additionally, Vonage objects to the designations of witness testimony from the Verizon matter for the reasons set forth in Vonage's contemporaneously filed Motion in Limine on this issue. (17) John C. Jarosz (Verizon v. Vonage Trial Transcript, March 5, 2007) 1389:20 ­ 1 3 9 0 : 3 1395:16 ­ 1 3 9 5 : 2 2 1410:23 ­ 1 4 1 1 : 4 1412:20 ­ 1412:22 1413:15 ­ 1414:4 Vonage objects to Sprint's designations to the extent that the designated testimony is hearsay, irrelevant, prejudicial, confusing, misleading, and is not based on personal and/or first hand knowledge. Additionally, Vonage objects to the designations of witness testimony from the Verizon matter for the reasons set forth in Vonage's contemporaneously filed Motion in Limine on this issue. (21) Edward Mulligan (Verizon v. Vonage, October 20, 2006)

Case 2:05-cv-02433-JWL

Document 290

Filed 08/17/2007

Page 10 of 12

30:20-38:10 39:1-40:13 42:16-44:20 45:11-46:14 48:15-19 49:19-20 50:7-19 53:3-56:14 63:5-64:1 65:6-65:13 78:8-17 79:6-20 103:7-104:7 109:1-111:4 114:8-12 114:20-115:2 122:15-123:7 159:14-166:21 Vonage objects to Sprint's designations to the extent that the designated testimony is hearsay, irrelevant, prejudicial, confusing, misleading, and is not based on personal and/or first hand knowledge. Additionally, Vonage objects to the designations of witness testimony from the Verizon matter for the reasons set forth in Vonage's contemporaneously filed Motion in Limine on this issue.

(25)

David Wu (Verizon v. Vonage, December 14, 2006) 18:15-19:20 25:4-26:2

Vonage objects to Sprint's designations to the extent that the designated testimony is hearsay, irrelevant, prejudicial, confusing, misleading, and is not based on personal and/or first hand knowledge. Additionally, Vonage objects to the designations of witness testimony from the Verizon matter for the reasons set forth in Vonage's contemporaneously filed Motion in Limine on this issue.

August 17, 2007

Respectfully submitted, _/s/ Catherine C. Theisen Terrence J. Campbell - 18377 Catherine C. Theisen - 22360

Case 2:05-cv-02433-JWL

Document 290

Filed 08/17/2007

Page 11 of 12

BARBER EMERSON, L.C. 1211 Massachusetts Street P.O. Box 667 Lawrence, KS 66044 [phone] [phone] Facsimile [e-mail] [e-mail]

Patrick D. McPherson Barry Golob Donald R. McPhail Duane Morris LLP 1667 K Street N.W. Washington, DC 20006-1608 202-776-7800 [e-mail] [e-mail] [e-mail]

Attorneys for Defendants/Counterclaim Plaintiffs Vonage Holdings Corp. and Vonage America, Inc.

Case 2:05-cv-02433-JWL

Document 290

Filed 08/17/2007

Page 12 of 12

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify on August 17, 2007, that a copy of Defendants Vonage Holdings Corp. and Vonage America, Inc.'s Counter-Designations to Plaintiff's Designation of Deposition Testimony was filed and served via the Court's electronic filing system: _/s/ Catherine C. Theisen Attorney for Defendants

DM1\1174172.1