Sprint Communications Company LP v. Vonage Holdings Corp., et al

Filing 398

MINUTE ENTRY for proceedings held before Judge John W. Lungstrum: Jury Trial completed on 9/25/2007. (Court Reporter Becky Ryder.) (Attachments: # 1 Witness List# 2 Plaintiff's Exhibit List# 3 Defendants' Exhibit List) (ses)

Download PDF
Sprint Communications Company LP v. Vonage Holdings Corp., et al Doc. 398 Case 2:05-cv-02433-JWL (Revised 5/93) Document 398 Filed 09/25/2007 Page 1 of 4 CLERK'S COURTROOM MINUTE SHEET - CIVIL JURY CASE NO. 05-2433-JWL CAPTION: Sprint Communications Company LP vs. Vonage Holdings, Corp. and Vonage America, Inc. APPEARANCES: Basil Trent Webb, Adam P. Seitz, Eric A. Buresh, and Peter E. Strand Louis N. Jameson, Barry Golob, Patrick D. McPherson, Donald McPhail, Lauren E. DeBruricker, and Terrence J. Campbell JUDGE: CLERK: REPORTER: Lungstrum Scheurer Ryder DATE: T/B: T/E: 09/04/2007 10:30 a.m. 5:15 p.m. 09/11/2007 10:35 a.m. 5:15 p.m. 09/17/2007 1:05 p.m. 3:38 p.m. 09/21/2007 8:30 a.m. 5:05 p.m. 09/05/2007 9:15 a.m. 5:00 p.m. 09/12/2007 9:05 a.m. 5:30 p.m. 09/18/2007 1:05 p.m. 5:00 p.m. 09/24/2007 5:00 p.m. 5:05 p.m. 09/06/2007 8:55 a.m. 5:00 p.m. 09/13/2007 9:00 a.m. 3:20 p.m. 09/19/2007 9:05 a.m. 6:00 p.m. 09/25/2007 11:55 a.m. 12:50 p.m. 09/07/2007 9:05 a.m. 5:00 p.m. 09/14/2007 9:00 a.m. 5:00 p.m. 09/20/2007 10:30 a.m. 11:20 a.m. PROCEEDINGS JURY IMPANELED: Tuesday, September 4, 2007 at 10:30 a.m. JURY SWORN: Tuesday, September 4, 2007 at 2:45 p.m. AT: Kansas City, Kansas Dockets.Justia.com Case 2:05-cv-02433-JWL Document 398 Filed 09/25/2007 Page 2 of 4 (BACK ROW) 1 2 3 4 101070801 - 181 101070801 - 213 101070801 - 047 101070801 - 178 5 6 7 8 (FRONT ROW) 101070801 - 166 101070801 - 197 101070801 - 072 101070801 - 150 TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 4, 2007: Voir Dire and jury selection. Opening statements. Plaintiff begins presentation of evidence. WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 5, 2007: Plaintiff continues presentation of evidence. Recess for the day. THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 6, 2007: Plaintiff continues presentation of evidence. Recess for the day. FRIDAY, SEPTEMBER 7, 2007: Plaintiff continues presentation of evidence. Recess for the day. TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 11, 2007: Plaintiff continues presentation of evidence. Recess for the day. WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 12, 2007: Plaintiff continues presentation of evidence. Recess for the day. THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 13, 2007: Case 2:05-cv-02433-JWL Document 398 Filed 09/25/2007 Page 3 of 4 Plaintiff continues presentation of evidence. Plaintiff rests. Defendant's oral Rule 50 motion for judgment as a matter of law - GRANTED IN PART, DENIED IN PART AND RETAINED UNDER ADVISEMENT IN PART. Defendant begins presentation of evidence. Recess for the day. FRIDAY, SEPTEMBER 14, 2007: Defendant continues presentation of evidence. Recess for the day. MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 17, 2007: Defendant continues presentation of evidence. Recess for the day. TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 18, 2007: Defendant continues presentation of evidence. Recess for the day. WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 19, 2007: Defendant continues presentation of evidence. Defendant rests. Plaintiff presents rebuttal evidence. Plaintiff rests. Defendant's pending Rule 50 motion (previously retained under advisement) is denied as set forth on the record. Plaintiff's Rule 50 motion - granted in part denied in part and retained under advisement in part Defendant Rule 50 motion - retained under advisement. Recess for the day. Case 2:05-cv-02433-JWL THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 20, 2007: Instruction conference. (Jury not present today) FRIDAY, SEPTEMBER 21, 2007: The court instructs the jury. Closing arguments. Jury retires for deliberations. Recess for the day. MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 24, 2007: Jury continues deliberations. Question #1 from jury Recess for the day TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 25, 2007: Jury continues deliberations Question #2 from the jury. Document 398 Filed 09/25/2007 Page 4 of 4 Verdict returned. The court directs the clerk the enter judgment. Recess.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?