Sprint Communications Company LP v. Vonage Holdings Corp., et al

Filing 79

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER entered. Signed by Magistrate Judge David J. Waxse on 3/6/2006.(jm)

Download PDF
Sprint Communications Company LP v. Vonage Holdings Corp., et al Doc. 79 Case 2:05-cv-02433-JWL Document 79 Filed 03/06/2006 Page 1 of 20 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY L.P., ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) THEGLOBE.COM, INC., ) VOICEGLO HOLDINGS, INC., ) VONAGE HOLDINGS CORP., ) VONAGE AMERICA, INC., ) ) Defendants. ) ) ) Case No. 05-2433-JWL-DJW STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER WHEREAS, Sprint Communications Company, L.P., Theglobe.com, Inc., Voiceglo Holdings, Inc. Vonage Holdings Corp. and Vonage America, Inc. (collectively, the "Parties") believe that certain materials, information and things discoverable in this case, both from the Parties and Third-Parties, may consist of trade secrets, proprietary information, confidential research and development information, and/or otherwise commercially valuable information that the respective Parties or Third-Parties maintain in confidence in the ordinary course of business; WHEREAS, the Parties reasonably believe that public disclosure of materials, information and things determined to be confidential could cause irreparable financial and competitive harms to the disclosing Party or Third-Party; WHEREAS, the Parties believe that good cause exists for the entry of a Protective Order that is narrowly tailored to protect the aforementioned confidential material, information and things of the Parties and any Third-Parties from whom confidential material, information or things are sought. STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER C ASE NO. 1861052V4 05-2433-JWL Dockets.Justia.com Case 2:05-cv-02433-JWL Document 79 Filed 03/06/2006 Page 2 of 20 By reason of the foregoing, the Parties, by their counsel, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(c) and subject to the approval of the Court, request entry of a Protective Order in the action. 1. PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS Disclosure and discovery activity in this action are likely to involve production of confidential, proprietary, or private information for which special protection from public disclosure and from use for any purpose other than prosecuting this litigation would be warranted. Accordingly, the parties hereby stipulate to and petition the court to enter the following Stipulated Protective Order. The parties acknowledge that this Order does not confer blanket protections on all disclosures or responses to discovery and that the protection it affords extends only to the limited information or items that are entitled under the applicable legal principles to treatment as confidential. 2. DEFINITIONS 2.1 Party: any party to this action and any parent, subsidiary, or affiliate of a party to this action, including all of their officers, directors, employees, consultants, or agents. 2.2 Disclosure or Discovery Material: all items or information, regardless of the medium or manner generated, stored, or maintained (including, among other things, testimony, transcripts, or tangible things) that are produced or generated in disclosures or responses to discovery in this matter. 2.3 "Confidential" Information or Items: information (regardless of how generated, stored or maintained) which comprises or contains information that the Producing Party claims in good faith to constitute or relate to: (1) trade secrets under applicable law; (2) commercial information (such as business plans, business strategies, market plans, market and/or demographic research, market penetration, market share, advertising, negotiations, and license 2 Stipulated Protective Order C ASE NO. 1861052V4 05-2433-JWL Case 2:05-cv-02433-JWL Document 79 Filed 03/06/2006 Page 3 of 20 agreements); (3) financial information (such as budgeting, accounting, sales figures and advertising expenditures); (4) business relationship information (such as information pertaining to potential and/or existing customers, competitors, suppliers, distributors, affiliates, subsidiaries and parents); (5) technical information (such as research and development information, lab notebooks, schematics, block diagrams, system level engineering documents, source code, and inventor notebooks and/or files); (6) information pertaining to products and product development efforts, concepts or plans; and (7) patent prosecution information (such as invention disclosures and present or future patent applications), each of which is not generally available or known to the public. 2.4 "Highly Confidential Attorneys' Eyes Only" Information or Items: extremely sensitive "Confidential Information or Items" and whose disclosure to another Party or nonparty would create a substantial risk of serious injury to the business or competitive interests of the Producing Party that could not be avoided by less restrictive means. 2.5 Receiving Party: a Party or Retained Expert(s) that receives Disclosure or Discovery Material from a Producing Party. 2.6 Producing Party: a Party or non-party that produces Disclosure or Any non-party executing the Agreement to Be Bound Discovery Material in this action. (attached as Exhibit A) shall be entitled the rights and protections provided to a Producing and/or Designating Party. 2.7 Designating Party: a Party or non-party that designates information or items that it produces in disclosures or in responses to discovery as "Confidential" or "Highly Confidential -- Attorneys' Eyes Only." 3 Stipulated Protective Order C ASE NO. 1861052V4 05-2433-JWL Case 2:05-cv-02433-JWL Document 79 Filed 03/06/2006 Page 4 of 20 2.8 Protected Material: any Disclosure or Discovery Material that is designated as "Confidential" or as "Highly Confidential Attorneys' Eyes Only." 2.9 Outside Counsel: attorneys who are not employees of a Party but who are specially retained to represent or advise a Party in this action. 2.10 2.11 as their support staffs). 2.12 Expert: a person with specialized knowledge or experience in a matter House Counsel: attorneys who are employees of a Party. Counsel: (without qualifier): Outside Counsel and House Counsel (as well pertinent to the litigation who has been specially retained by a Party or its counsel to serve as an expert witness or as a consultant in this action and who is not a past or a current employee of a Party or of a competitor of a Party's and who, at the time of retention, is not anticipated to become an employee of a Party or a competitor of a Party's. This definition includes a professional jury or trial consultant retained in connection with this litigation. 2.13 Professional Vendors: persons or entities that provide litigation support services (e.g., photocopying; videotaping; translating; preparing exhibits or demonstrations; organizing, storing, retrieving data in any form or medium; etc.) and their employees and subcontractors. 3. SCOPE The protections conferred by this Stipulation and Order cover not only Protected Material (as defined above), but also any information copied or extracted therefrom, as well as all copies, excerpts, summaries, or compilations thereof, plus testimony, conversations, or presentations by parties or counsel to or in court or in other settings that might reveal Protected Material. 4. DURATION 4 Stipulated Protective Order C ASE NO. 1861052V4 05-2433-JWL Case 2:05-cv-02433-JWL Document 79 Filed 03/06/2006 Page 5 of 20 Even after the termination of this litigation, the confidentiality obligations imposed by this Order shall remain in effect until a Designating Party agrees otherwise in writing or a court order otherwise directs. 5. DESIGNATING PROTECTED MATERIAL 5.1 Exercise of Restraint and Care in Designating Material for Protection: Each Party or non-party that designates information or items for protection under this Order must take care to limit any such designation to specific material that qualifies under the appropriate standards. A Designating Party must take care to designate for protection only those parts of material, documents, items, or oral or written communications that qualify so that o ther portions of the material, documents, items, or communications for which protection is not warranted are not swept unjustifiably within the ambit of this Order. Mass, indiscriminate, or routinized designations are prohibited. Designations that are shown to be clearly unjustified, or that have been made for an improper purpose (e.g., to unnecessarily encumber or retard the case development process, or to impose unnecessary expenses and burdens on other parties), expose the Designating Party to sanctions. If it comes to a Party's or a non-party's attention that information or items that it designated for protection do not qualify for protection at all, or do not qualify for the level of protection initially asserted, that Party or non-party must promptly notify all other parties that it is withdrawing the mistaken designation. 5.2 Manner and Timing of Designations: Except as otherwise provided in this Order (see, e.g., second paragraph of section 5.2(a), below), or as otherwise stipulated or ordered, material that qualifies for protection under this Order must be clearly so designated before the material is disclosed or produced. Designation in conformity with this Order requires: 5 Stipulated Protective Order C ASE NO. 1861052V4 05-2433-JWL Case 2:05-cv-02433-JWL Document 79 Filed 03/06/2006 Page 6 of 20 (a) for information in documentary form (apart from transcripts of depositions or other pretrial or trial proceedings), that the Producing Party affix the legend "CONFIDENTIAL" or "HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY" at the top of each page that contains protected material. If only a portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins) and must specify, for each portion, the level of protection being asserted (either "CONFIDENTIAL" or "HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY"). A Party or non-party that makes original documents or materials available for inspection need not designate them for protection until after the inspecting Party has indicated which material it would like copied and produced. During the inspection and before the designation, all of the material made available for inspection shall be deemed "HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY." After the inspecting Party has identified the documents it wants copied and produced, the Producing Party must determine which documents, or portions thereof, qualify for protection under this Order, then, before producing the specified documents, the Producing Party must affix the appropriate legend ("CONFIDENTIAL" or "HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY") at the top of each page that contains Protected Material. If only a portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins) and must specify, for each portion, the level of protection being asserted (either "CONFIDENTIAL" or "HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY"). 6 Stipulated Protective Order C ASE NO. 1861052V4 05-2433-JWL Case 2:05-cv-02433-JWL Document 79 Filed 03/06/2006 Page 7 of 20 (b) for testimony given in deposition or in other pretrial or trial proceedings , that the Party or non-party offering or sponsoring the testimony identify on the record, before the close of the deposition, hearing, or other proceeding, all protected testimony, and further specify any portions of the testimony that qualify as "HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY." When it is impractical to identify separately each portion of testimony that is entitled to protection, and when it appears that substantial portions of the testimony may qualify for protection, the Party or non-party that sponsors, offers, or gives the testimony may invoke on the record (before the deposition or proceeding is concluded) a right to have up to 20 days to identify the specific portions of the testimony as to which protection is sought and to specify the level of protection being asserted ("CONFIDENTIAL" or "HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY"). Only those portions of the testimony that are appropriately designated for protection within the 20 days shall be covered by the provisions of this Stipulated Protective Order. Transcript pages containing Protected Material must be separately bound by the court reporter, who must affix to the top of each such page the legend "CONFIDENTIAL" or "HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY," as instructed by the Party or nonparty offering or sponsoring the witness or presenting the testimony. (c) for information produced in some form other than documentary, and for any other tangible items, that the Producing Party affix in a prominent place on the exterior of the container or containers in which the information or item is stored the legend "CONFIDENTIAL" or "HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY." If only portions of the information or item warrant protection, the Producing Party, to the extent 7 Stipulated Protective Order C ASE NO. 1861052V4 05-2433-JWL Case 2:05-cv-02433-JWL Document 79 Filed 03/06/2006 Page 8 of 20 practicable, shall identify the protected portions, specifying whether they qualify as "Confidential" or as "Highly Confidential Attorneys' Eyes Only." 5.3 Inadvertent Failures to Designate: If timely corrected, an inadvertent failure to designate qualified information or items as "Confidential" or "Highly Confidential Attorneys' Eyes Only" does not, standing alone, waive the Designating Party's right to secure protection under this Order for such material. If material is appropriately designated as "Confidential" or "Highly Confidential Attorneys' Eyes Only" after the material was initially produced, the Receiving Party, on timely notification of the designation, must make reasonable efforts to assure that the material is treated in accordance with the provisions of this Order. 5. CHALLENGING CONFIDENTIALITY DESIGNATIONS 6.1 Timing of Challenges: Unless a prompt challenge to a Designating Party's confidentiality designation is necessary to avoid foreseeable substantial unfairness, unnecessary economic burdens, or a later significant disruption or delay of the litigation, a Party does not waive its right to challenge a confidentiality designation by electing not to mount a challenge promptly after the original designation is disclosed. 6.2 Meet and Confer: A Party that elects to initiate a challenge to a Designating Party's confidentiality designation must do so in good faith and must begin the process by conferring directly (in voice to voice dialogue; other forms of communication are not sufficient) with counsel for the Designating Party. In conferring, the challenging Party must explain the basis for its belief that the confidentiality designation was not proper and must give the Designating Party an opportunity to review the designated material, to reconsider the circumstances, and, if no change in designation is offered, to explain the basis for the chosen 8 Stipulated Protective Order C ASE NO. 1861052V4 05-2433-JWL Case 2:05-cv-02433-JWL Document 79 Filed 03/06/2006 Page 9 of 20 designation. A challenging Party may proceed to the next stage of the challenge process only if it has engaged in this meet and confer process first. 6.3 Judicial Intervention: A Party that elects to press a challenge to a confidentiality designation after considering the justification offered by the Designating Party may file and serve a motion under D. Kan. Rule 7.1 (and in compliance with D. Kan. Rule 37.1, if applicable) that identifies the challenged material and sets forth in detail the basis for the challenge. Each such motion must be accompanied by a competent declaration that affirms that the movant has complied with the meet and confer requirements imposed in the preceding paragraph and that sets forth with specificity the justification for the confidentiality designation that was given by the Designating Party in the meet and confer dialogue. The burden of persuasion in any such challenge proceeding shall be on the Designating Party. Until the court rules on the challenge, all parties shall continue to afford the material in question the level of protection to which it is entitled under the Producing Party's designation. 6. ACCESS TO AND USE OF PROTECTED MATERIAL 7.1 Basic Principles: A Receiving Party may use Protected Material that is disclosed or produced by another Party or by a non-party in connection with this case only for prosecuting, defending, or attempting to settle this litigation. Such Protected Material may be disclosed only to the categories of persons and under the conditions described in this Order. When the litigation has been terminated, a Receiving Party must comply with the provisions of section 12, below (FINAL DISPOSITION). 9 Stipulated Protective Order C ASE NO. 1861052V4 05-2433-JWL Case 2:05-cv-02433-JWL Document 79 Filed 03/06/2006 Page 10 of 20 Protected Material must be stored and maintained by a Receiving Party at a location and in a secure manner that ensures that access is limited to the persons authorized under this Order. 7.2 Disclosure of "CONFIDENTIAL" Information or Items: Unless otherwise ordered by the court or permitted in writing by the Designating Party, a Receiving Party may disclose any information or item designated CONFIDENTIAL only to: (a) the Receiving Party's Outside Counsel of record in this action, as well as employees of said Counsel to whom it is reasonably necessary to disclose the information for this litigation; (b) the officers, directors, and employees (including House Counsel) of the Receiving Party to whom disclosure is reasonably necessary for this litigation and who have signed the "Agreement to Be Bound by Protective Order" (Exhibit A); (c) experts (as defined in this Order) of the Receiving Party to whom disclosure is reasonably necessary for this litigation and who have signed the "Agreement to Be Bound by Protective Order" (Exhibit A), as well as employees of said experts to whom it is reasonably necessary to disclose the information for this litigation; (d) (e) the Court and its personnel; court reporters, their staffs, and professional vendors to whom disclosure is reasonably necessary for this litigation; (f) during their depositions, witnesses in the action to whom disclosure is reasonably necessary and who have signed the "Agreement to Be Bound by Protective Order" (Exhibit A). Pages of transcribed deposition testimony or exhibits to 10 Stipulated Protective Order C ASE NO. 1861052V4 05-2433-JWL Case 2:05-cv-02433-JWL Document 79 Filed 03/06/2006 Page 11 of 20 depositions that reveal Protected Material must be separately bound by the court reporter and may not be disclosed to anyone except as permitted under this Stipulated Protective Order; (g) the author of the document or the original source of the information, and any copied recipients thereof; and (h) 7.3 professional vendors. Disclosure of "HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY" Information or Items: Unless otherwise ordered by the court or permitted in writing by the Designating Party, a Receiving Party may disclose any information or item designated "HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY" only to: (a) the Receiving Party's Outside Counsel of record in this action, as well as employees of said Counsel to whom it is reasonably necessary to disclose the information for this litigation; (b) House Counsel (as defined in this order) of the Receiving Party (1) to whom disclosure is reasonably necessary for this litigation, (2) who have signed the "Agreement to Be Bound by Protective Order" (Exhibit A), (3) as to whom the procedures set forth in paragraph 7.4, below, have been followed, and (4) who is not involved in any competitive decision making of a Party; (c) experts (as defined in this Order) (1) to whom disclosure is reasonably necessary for this litigation, (2) who have signed the "Agreement to Be Bound by Protective Order" (Exhibit A), and (3) as to whom the procedures set forth in paragraph 7.4 below, have been followed , as well as employees of said experts to whom it is reasonably necessary to disclose the information for this litigation; (d) the Court and its personnel; 11 Stipulated Protective Order C ASE NO. 1861052V4 05-2433-JWL Case 2:05-cv-02433-JWL Document 79 Filed 03/06/2006 Page 12 of 20 (e) court reporters, their staffs, and professional vendors to whom disclosure is reasonably necessary for this litigation; (f) the author of the document or the original source of the information, and any copied recipients thereof; and (g) 7.4 professional vendors. Procedures for Approving Disclosure of "HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY" Information or Items to "Experts": (a) unless otherwise ordered by the court or agreed in writing by the Designating Party, a Party that seeks to disclose to an "Expert" or a "House Counsel" (as defined in this Order) any information or item that has been designated "HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY" first must make a written request to the Designating Party that (1) sets forth the full name of the Expert or House Counsel and the city and state of his or her primary residence, (2) attaches a copy of the Expert's or House Counsel's current resume, (3) identifies the Expert's or House Counsel's current employer(s), (4) identifies each person or entity from whom the Expert or House Counsel has received compensation for work in his or her areas of expertise or to whom the Expert or House Counsel has provided professional services at any time during the preceding five years, (5) identifies (by name and number of the case, filing date, and location of court) any intellectual property litigation or patent application in connection with which the Expert or House Counsel has provided any professional services during the preceding five years, and (6) in the case of a House Counsel, identifies the person's title, job history, and job responsibilities and the reasons why disclosure of HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL ATTORNEYS' EYE ONLY Information or Items to such House Counsel is contended by the Receiving Party to be reasonably necessary for this litigation. 12 Stipulated Protective Order C ASE NO. 1861052V4 05-2433-JWL Case 2:05-cv-02433-JWL Document 79 Filed 03/06/2006 Page 13 of 20 (b) a Party that makes a request and provides the information specified in the preceding paragraph may disclose the subject Protected Material to the identified Expert or House Counsel unless, within seven court days of delivering the request, the Party receives a written objection from the Designating Party. Any such objection must set forth in detail the grounds on which it is based. (c) a Party that receives a timely written objection must meet and confer with the Designating Party (through direct voice to voice dialogue) to try to resolve the matter by agreement. If no agreement is reached, the Party seeking to make the disclosure to the Expert may file a motion as provided in D. Kan. Rule 7.1 (and in compliance with D. Kan. Rule 37.1, if applicable) seeking permission from the court to do so. In addition, any such motion must be accompanied by a competent declaration in which the movant describes the parties' efforts to resolve the matter by agreement. In any such proceeding the Party opposing disclosure to the Expert shall bear the burden of proving that the risk of harm that the disclosure would entail (under the safeguards proposed) outweighs the Receiving Party's need to disclose the Protected Material to its Expert. 7. PROTECTED MATERIAL SUBPOENAED OR ORDERED PRODUCED IN OTHER LITIGATION If a Receiving Party is served with a subpoena or an order issued in other litigation that would compel disclosure of any information or items designated in this action as "CONFIDENTIAL" or "HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY," the Receiving Party must so notify the Designating Party, in writing (by fax, if possible) 13 Stipulated Protective Order C ASE NO. 1861052V4 05-2433-JWL Case 2:05-cv-02433-JWL Document 79 Filed 03/06/2006 Page 14 of 20 immediately and in no event more than three court days after receiving the subpoena or order. Such notification must include a copy of the subpoena or court order. The Receiving Party also must immediately inform in writing the Party who caused the subpoena or order to issue in the other litigation that some or all the material covered by the subpoena or order is the subject of this Protective Order. In addition, the Receiving Party must deliver a copy of this Stipulated Protective Order promptly to the Party in the other action that caused the subpoena or order to issue. The purpose of imposing these duties is to alert the interested parties to the existence of this Protective Order and to afford the Designating Party in this case an opportunity to try to protect its confidentiality interests in the court from which the subpoena or order issued. The Designating Party shall bear the burdens and the expenses of seeking protection in that court of its confidential material and nothing in these provisions should be construed as authorizing or encouraging a Receiving Party in this action to disobey a lawful directive from another court. 8. UNAUTHORIZED DISCLOSURE OF PROTECTED MATERIAL If a Receiving Party learns that, by inadvertence or otherwise, it has disclosed Protected Material to any person or in any circumstance not authorized under this Stipulated Protective Order, the Receiving Party must immediately (a) notify in writing the Designating Party of the unauthorized disclosures, (b) use its best efforts to retrieve all copies of the Protected Material, (c) inform the person or persons to whom unauthorized disclosures were made of all the terms of this Order, and (d) request such person or persons to execute the "Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound" that is attached hereto as Exhibit A. Any such disclosure shall not constitute a waiver of the Producing Party's designation of the Protected Material. 14 Stipulated Protective Order C ASE NO. 1861052V4 05-2433-JWL Case 2:05-cv-02433-JWL Document 79 Filed 03/06/2006 Page 15 of 20 9. UNINTENTIONAL DISCLOSURE OF PRIVILEGED INFORMATION Counsel shall exert their best efforts to identify documents or material protected by the attorney-client privilege or the work-product doctrine prior to the disclosure of any such documents or material. If, however, a party unintentionally discloses documents or material that is privileged or otherwise immune from discovery, the party shall, within five (5) business days upon discovery of the disclosure, so advise the Receiving Party in writing, request the documents or material be returned, and attach a privilege log with an entry pertaining to the documents or material that is privileged or otherwise immune from discovery. If that request is made and the privilege log provided, no party to this action shall thereafter assert that the disclosure waived any privilege or immunity. It is further agreed that the Receiving Party will return or destroy the inadvertently produced documents or material, and all copies and derivations, within five (5) business days of the Receiving Party's receipt of a written request for the return of the documents or material. 10. FILING PROTECTED MATERIAL Without written permission from the Designating Party or a court order secured after appropriate notice to all interested persons, a Party may not file in the public record in this action any Protected Material. 11. FINAL DISPOSITION Unless otherwise ordered or agreed in writing by the Producing Party, within sixty days after the final termination of this action, each Receiving Party must return all Protected Material to the Producing Party. As used in this subdivision, "all Protected Material" includes all copies, abstracts, compilations, summaries or any other form of reproducing or 15 Stipulated Protective Order C ASE NO. 1861052V4 05-2433-JWL Case 2:05-cv-02433-JWL Document 79 Filed 03/06/2006 Page 16 of 20 capturing any of the Protected Material. With permission in writing from the Designating Party, the Receiving Party may destroy some or all of the Protected Material instead of returning it. Whether the Protected Material is returned or destroyed, the Receiving Party must submit a written certification to the Producing Party (and, if not the same person or entity, to the Designating Party) by the sixty day deadline that identifies (by category, where appropriate) all the Protected Material that was returned or destroyed and that affirms that the Receiving Party has not retained any copies, abstracts, compilations, summaries or other forms of reproducing or capturing any of the Protected Material. Notwithstanding this provision, Counsel are entitled to retain an archival copy of all pleadings, motion papers, transcripts, legal memoranda, correspondence or attorney work product, even if such materials contain Protected Material. Any such archival copies that contain or constitute Protected Material remain subject to this Protective Order as set forth in Section 4 (DURATION), above. 12. MISCELLANEOUS 13.1 Right to Further Relief: Nothing in this Order abridges the right of any person to seek its modification by the Court in the future. 13.2 Right to Assert Other Objections: By stipulating to the entry of this Protective Order no Party waives any right it otherwise would have to object to disclosing or producing any information or item on any ground not addressed in this Stipulated Protective Order. Similarly, no Party waives any right to object on any ground to use in evidence of any of the material covered by this Protective Order. IT IS SO STIPULATED, THROUGH COUNSEL OF RECORD. 16 Stipulated Protective Order C ASE NO. 1861052V4 05-2433-JWL Case 2:05-cv-02433-JWL Document 79 Filed 03/06/2006 Page 17 of 20 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated in Kansas City, Kansas on this 6t h day of March, 2006. s/ David J. Waxse David J. Waxse United States Magistrate Judge cc: All counsel and pro se parties ___/s/ Adam P. Seitz_____________________ B. Trent Webb, KS Bar No. 15965 Adam P. Seitz, KS Bar No. 21059 Eric A. Buresh, KS Bar No. 19895 2555 Grand Boulevard Kansas City, Missouri 64108-2613 816-474-6550 Telephone 816-421-5547 Facsimile Plaintiff Sprint Communications Company L.P. DATED: March 3, 2006 _/s/ Henry C. Lebowitz __________________ James D. Oliver Scott C. Nehrbass Foulston Siefkin LLP 40 Corporate Woods Suite 1050 9401 Indian Creek Parkway Overland Park, Kansas 66210 James W. Dabney Henry C. Lebowitz Malcolm J. Duncan Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver & Jacobson LLP One New York Plaza New York, New York 10004 Attorneys for Defendants theglobe.com, Inc. and Voiceglo Holdings, Inc. 17 Stipulated Protective Order C ASE NO. 1861052V4 DATED: March 3, 2006 05-2433-JWL Case 2:05-cv-02433-JWL Document 79 Filed 03/06/2006 Page 18 of 20 DATED: March 3, 2006 __/s/ Barry Golob _______ ______________ Don R. Lolli Patrick J. Kaine Dysart Taylor Lay Cotter & McMonigle P.C. 4420 Madison Avenue Kansas City, Missouri 64111 Patrick D. McPherson Patrick C. Muldoon Barry Golob Duane Morris LLP 1667 K. Street N.W. Washington, DC 20006-1608 Attorneys for Defendants Vonage Holdings Corp. and Vonage America, Inc. 18 Stipulated Protective Order C ASE NO. 1861052V4 05-2433-JWL Case 2:05-cv-02433-JWL Document 79 Filed 03/06/2006 Page 19 of 20 EXHIBIT A IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY L.P., ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) THEGLOBE.COM, INC., ) VOICEGLO HOLDINGS, INC., ) VONAGE HOLDINGS CORP., ) VONAGE AMERICA, INC., ) ) Defendants. ) ) ) Case No. 05-2433-JWL ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND AGREEMENT TO BE BOUND BY THE PROTECTIVE ORDER I, _____________________________, declare under penalty of perjury that I have read in its entirety and understand the Stipulated Protective Order that was issued by the United States District Court for the District of Kansas in this matter. I agree to comply with and to be bound by all the terms of this Stipulated Protective Order and I understand and acknowledge that failure to so comply could expose me to sanctions and punishment in the nature of contempt. I solemnly promise that I will not disclose in any manner any information or 19 Stipulated Protective Order C ASE NO. 1861052V4 05-2433-JWL Case 2:05-cv-02433-JWL Document 79 Filed 03/06/2006 Page 20 of 20 item that is subject to this Stipulated Protective Order to any person or entity except in strict compliance with the provisions of this Order. I further agree to submit to the jurisdiction of the United States District Court for the District of Kansas for the purpose of enforcing the terms of this Stipulated Protective Order, even if such enforcement proceedings occur after termination of this action. Date: City and State where sworn and signed: Printed name: Signature: _________________________________ _________________________________ __________________________________ __________________________________ 20 Stipulated Protective Order C ASE NO. 1861052V4 05-2433-JWL

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?