Lang v. Nigro, M.D. et al

Filing 9

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. On or before November 17, 2008, plaintiff to show good cause in writing why her complaint should not be dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Signed by Chief Judge Kathryn H. Vratil on 11/5/2008.(bg)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS CYNTHIA LANG, Plaintiff, v. LEE NIGRO, M.D., WEIGHT LOSS SURGICAL CENTER, LLC and WEIGHT LOSS HEALTHCARE CENTERS OF AMERICA, INC., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACTION No. 08-2442-KHV ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE Plaintiff, a Missouri citizen, brings suit against Weight Loss Surgical Center, LLC and others. Plaintiff's sole basis for subject matter jurisdiction is diversity of citizenship. See Complaint (Doc. #1) filed September 19, 2008 ¶ 2; 28 U.S.C. § 1332. Section 1332 requires complete diversity between all plaintiffs and all defendants. Radil v. Sanborn W. Camps, Inc., 384 F.3d 1220, 1225 (10th Cir. 2004). Plaintiff alleges that Weight Loss Surgical Center, LLC is a Kansas corporation. Complaint (Doc. #1) ¶ 2. For the purpose of diversity jurisdiction, however, an LLC is a citizen of each state of which a member is a citizen. Birdsong v. Westglen Endoscopy Ctr., LLC, 176 F. Supp.2d 1245, 1248 (D. Kan. 2001); see also Pramco, LLC v. San Juan Bay Marina, Inc., 435 F.3d 51, 54 (1st Cir. 2006) (every circuit to consider issue has held that citizenship of LLC is determined by citizenship of all of its members). The complaint does not allege the citizenship of each member of Weight Loss Surgical Center, LLC and it therefore fails to properly allege subject matter jurisdiction. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that on or before November 17, 2008, plaintiff show good cause in writing why her complaint should not be dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Dated this 5th day of November, 2008 at Kansas City, Kansas. s/ Kathryn H. Vratil Kathryn H. Vratil United States District Judge -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?