Data Locker Inc. v. Apricorn, Inc. et al
Filing
47
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER. The court finds good cause to enter the protective order submitted by the parties, but with modification to paragraphs 3, 7, and 9 to comport with the District of Kansas Guidelines for Protective Orders. Signed by Magistrate Judge James P. O'Hara on 3/1/2013. (ah)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS
DATA LOCKER INC.
Plaintiff,
Civil No. 12-cv-2630 JTM/JPO
v.
APRICORN, INC.,
LENOVO (UNITED STATES) INC. and
LENOVO HOLDING COMPANY, INC.
Defendants.
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER
WHEREAS, this is an action for patent infringement that implicates sensitive research,
customer, financial, and marketing information and documents and information may be
sought, produced or exhibited by and among the parties to the above captioned
proceeding which constitutes confidential and highly confidential internal technical product
design, product pricing strategies, business relations, the identification of customers, market
research, financial data, the amount and/or source of income, and profits, losses, and
expenditures of the parties, or otherwise relates to or constitutes confidential and/or trade
secret commercial information within the meaning of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure
26(c)(1)(G). Accordingly, the Court finds that good cause exists, including, but not limited
to, maintaining each respective party’s competitive standing in the market, for the entry of
this Protective Order in this action pursuant to Rule 26(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil
Procedure in order to provide access by the parties to such confidential information, subject
to certain protective provisions set forth herein. The parties to this action are Data Locker,
O:\ORDERS\12-2630-PO.doc
Inc. (“Plaintiff”) and Defendants Apricorn, Inc., Lenovo (United States) Inc., and Lenovo
Holding Company, Inc. (collectively “Defendants”).
By stipulation and agreement of the Parties, and with the express consent of counsel for
Plaintiffs and counsel for Defendants, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, pursuant to Rule 26(c)
of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the following terms and conditions shall govern
the treatment of confidential information and documents and information produced or
disclosed in the course of discovery in this action, Case No. 12-cv-02630:
1.
Definitions: For purposes of this Protective Order the following capitalized terms
shall have the meanings indicated:
a.
“Counsel” shall mean the outside law firms who are counsel of record for
the respective parties in this matter including their staff and independent contractors, and
in-house counsel for the corporate parties herein who are counsel of record for the
respective parties, and such legal, clerical, paralegal and secretarial staff employed or
retained by outside or in-house counsel for the sole purpose of assisting in the litigation.
Additionally, for purposes of this Protective Order, “Counsel” shall include the chief
executive officer of Plaintiff and the chief executive officer of each Defendant.
b.
“Outside Counsel” shall mean the outside law firms who are counsel of
record for the respective parties in this matter including their staff and independent
contractors, and such legal, paralegal and secretarial staff employed or retained by
Outside Counsel for the sole purpose of assisting in the litigation. “Outside Counsel”
specifically excludes, without limitation, in-house counsel for the corporate parties
herein, such legal, clerical, paralegal and secretarial staff employed or retained by
2
in¬house counsel, the chief executive officer of Plaintiff, and the chief executive officer
of each Defendant.
c.
“Documents” shall mean tangible records and things produced in any form
in this matter including, without limitation, printed matter, electronic media or physical
things.
d.
“Requesting Party” shall mean the party to this lawsuit seeking disclosure
of information in response to written discovery, requests for admission, deposition
questions or otherwise.
e.
“Producing Party” shall mean the party from whom disclosure of
information is sought in response to written discovery, requests for admission, deposition
questions or otherwise.
f.
“Proprietary Information” shall mean trade secret or other proprietary or
confidential Documents or other information including but not limited to, business,
accounting, sales, marketing, tax, and employment records, business plans, marketing
data and information, training procedures, design drawings in any medium, patent or
trademark applications, licenses, agreements, and contracts, trade data and research and
development documents, customer identity and lists, and computer software programs in
source code or object code. Proprietary Information shall be of two types:
(1)
“Confidential” information shall mean Proprietary Information the
disclosure of which shall be restricted to the Requesting Party’s Counsel, and its
specially retained non-employee Experts and Non-testifying Experts, as defined in
3
Section 5(b) below. Confidential information shall not be disclosed to any thirdparty, except as expressly provided herein.
(2)
“Highly Confidential – Counsel’s Eyes Only” shall mean
Proprietary Information the disclosure of which shall be restricted to Outside
Counsel for the Requesting Party and specially retained non-employee Experts
and Non-testifying Experts. “Highly Confidential – Counsel’s Eyes Only”
information shall not be disclosed by that Outside Counsel to the Requesting
Party or to any other person, except as expressly provided herein. The designation
“Highly Confidential – Counsel’s Eyes Only” shall be reserved for information
which may not be disclosed to the Requesting Party in this litigation because of its
status as a competitor and shall be reserved for information relating to prices,
business plans and forecasts, marketing/advertising strategies, customer orders,
customer sales quotations, sales volumes, company personnel files, highly
sensitive corporate documents, highly sensitive documents regarding corporate
and/or customer relationships, existing and future product designs, source code,
customer lists or identities, profits, losses, third party contracts or other similar
information of the most confidential nature.
2.
Designations:
a.
Documents and Responses to Written Discovery: Each interrogatory
answer or portion thereof, each answer to requests for admission or portions thereof, and
each page of a Document produced in this matter or portions thereof, which is deemed by
a Producing Party to disclose Proprietary Information of that party, shall be so identified
4
by that party with the name of the classifying party, e.g. “Plaintiff” or “Defendant,”
followed by the appropriate classification as defined in paragraph 1(e)(1) or (2) above.
The identity of the classifying party need not be provided if it is indicated as part of the
production number (e.g. plaintiff’s document “P00001”) contained on the document.
Unless otherwise agreed between the parties or otherwise permitted under this Order, the
identification and designation of Proprietary Information shall be made at the time when
the answer to the interrogatory or the answer to the request for admission is served and
when a copy of the Document is provided to the Requesting Party. The Producing Party
shall be responsible for labeling Documents containing Proprietary Information in
accordance with the appropriate classification as defined in paragraph 1(e)(1) or (2)
above.
b.
Document Inspections: The parties recognize that in some instances it may
not be possible to identify or designate specific Documents containing Proprietary
Information prior to inspection due to the volume of Documents and/or the legitimate
desire of a party not to mark its original records. In such circumstances, only Outside
Counsel for the Requesting Party shall be permitted to perform any initial review of the
Documents. No Documents of the party producing Documents shall be removed from the
site of the inspection or copied until such producing party has had an opportunity to
review and designate such Documents in the manner previously explained. Any
Documents which are subject to the attorney-client privilege or work product protection
that are inadvertently disclosed shall immediately be returned by the receiving party, and
the Requesting Party shall also destroy any copies or summaries of, or notes relating to,
any such inadvertently or mistakenly produced information.
5
c.
Depositions: To the extent possible, the Parties will attempt to designate
deposition transcripts as containing Proprietary Information during the deposition.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, deposition transcripts shall be treated initially as
Proprietary Information designated as “Highly Confidential – Counsel’s Eyes Only” in
their entirety until twenty-one (21) days after receipt of the final transcript unless the
parties expressly agree otherwise. In the event a party other than the Producing Party
wishes to have a company representative attend the deposition, that company
representative shall withdraw from the deposition when requested to do so by the other
party asserting the confidentiality of the deposition testimony and exhibits. Within
twenty-one (21) days after receipt of the final transcript, any party may designate portions
of a deposition transcript as Proprietary Information and designate the appropriate level
of confidentiality. The designation shall be accomplished by a letter to all other parties
and the court reporter listing the pages, lines and exhibits constituting Proprietary
Information and the category of confidentiality. If portions of the transcript or exhibits
were designated as Proprietary Information during the deposition, such designation
remains in force and need not be reasserted under this paragraph. After twenty-one (21)
days, only those portions of any transcript which are separately designated as Proprietary
Information (whether during the deposition or after the receipt of the transcript) shall be
deemed entitled to protection as Proprietary Information as so designated. If a party
designates all or a portion of a transcript as Proprietary Information, all other parties shall
mark the designated portions of the transcript with the designated level of confidentiality.
Documents designated as Proprietary Information pursuant to this Protective Order shall
6
retain their Proprietary Information status even though marked as a deposition exhibit,
and such status need not be reasserted under this paragraph.
d.
Inadvertent Failure to Designate: If, through inadvertence, a producing
party provides any material containing Proprietary Information without designating the
material as such, whether by document production or deposition testimony, the producing
party may subsequently inform the receiving party in writing of the Proprietary
Information status of the material and designate the appropriate level of confidentiality.
The receiving party shall thereafter treat the disclosed material as Proprietary
Information, in accordance with the written notification of the inadvertent disclosure. The
receiving party shall take reasonable steps to advise persons to whom disclosure was
made prior to receipt of a Proprietary Information designation of such designation and of
this Order, but shall not otherwise be required to retrieve or take any action to protect the
confidentiality of information or copies of documents disclosed prior to the receipt of the
Proprietary Information designation. Any Documents which are subject to the attorneyclient privilege or work product protection that are inadvertently disclosed shall
immediately be returned by the receiving party, and the receiving party shall also destroy
any copies or summaries of, or notes relating to, any such inadvertently or mistakenly
produced information.
e.
All designations made pursuant to this Protective Order are subject to the
provisions of F.R.C.P. 26(g).
3.
Restrictions on Use: Any Proprietary Information produced during the course of
this action shall be used solely for the purposes of this action and shall not be disclosed or used
7
by the Requesting Party or its Counsel for any business, commercial, competitive or publicity
purposes, including for the prosecution of any U. S. or foreign patent or trademark application. A
Requesting Party or its Counsel shall not use any Documents designated Confidential or any
Proprietary Information contained in the Confidential Documents for purposes of obtaining
media attention or exposure or publicizing this litigation. All obligations and duties arising under
this Protective Order shall survive the termination of this action.
4.
Court Ordered Disclosure: Nothing herein shall prevent disclosure beyond the
terms of this Protective Order if the Court, after notice to all affected parties, orders such
disclosure.
5.
Obligations of Counsel: It shall be the responsibility of Counsel for the respective
parties herein to ensure strict compliance with the provisions of this Protective Order in their
dealings with Proprietary Information, and it shall be the responsibility of Counsel to take
reasonable and proper steps to ensure that this Protective Order and all provisions thereof are
made known to any person who shall examine Proprietary Information as provided herein. All
persons responsible for determining that discovery responses, Documents and depositions
contain Proprietary Information shall be familiar with this Protective Order and the scope of its
protection. All Proprietary Information including any and all copies thereof shall be kept by
Counsel in an appropriately safe place, given its status. Proprietary Information may be disclosed
to third persons only to the extent necessary for conducting this litigation, only when such
disclosure is preceded by a copy of this Order, and only as follows:
8
a.
The Court: The Court, persons employed by the Court, jury personnel, and
stenographers transcribing the testimony or argument at a hearing, trial or deposition in
this action or any appeal therefrom;
b.
Experts: Proprietary Information may be disclosed to testifying or non-
testifying experts who are not employees of the Parties and are utilized for purposes of
this litigation only after each such consultant has read this Protective Order and
consented in writing to be bound by the provisions thereof as indicated by execution of
the Acknowledgment attached hereto as Exhibit A.
c.
Non-Parties: Proprietary Information may be disclosed to other persons
not authorized by this Protective Order only with the mutual agreement in writing
between Counsel in advance of any disclosure to such person and only upon execution of
the Acknowledgment attached hereto as Exhibit A.
d.
Deposition Witnesses: Proprietary Information may be disclosed to
deposition witnesses during a deposition, while being questioned by Outside Counsel in
connection with this action, but only to the extent necessary to assist such Outside
Counsel in the prosecution or defense of this action, to the extent relevant to information
reasonably believed to be within the knowledge of the deposition witness, and provided
that such deposition witness signs an Acknowledgement in the form attached as Exhibit
A and thereby agrees to be bound by the terms of this Order. No Acknowledgment is
required if the witness being questioned is a present or past employee or consultant of the
Producing Party;
9
e.
Authors or Recipients: Proprietary Information may be disclosed to an
author or prior recipient of the Proprietary Information to be disclosed, summarized,
described, characterized or otherwise communicated or made available, but only to the
extent necessary to assist Counsel in the prosecution or defense of this action;
f.
Insurance Representatives: Proprietary Information may be disclosed to
the claims counsel or representative of any insurer of any party to this action, provided
that such disclosure is made only in connection with a claim for a defense or indemnity
arising from this action and provided that such person sign an Acknowledgement in the
form attached as Exhibit A and thereby agree to be bound by the terms of this Order;
g.
Proprietary Information may be disclosed to outside photocopying,
imaging, data base, graphics or design services retained by Outside Counsel for purposes
of preparing demonstrative or other exhibits for deposition, trial, or other court
proceedings in this Action and to outside stenographers and videographers employed by
Outside Counsel in connection with depositions and other like proceedings;
h.
In-house Representatives: Proprietary Information labeled “Confidential”
may be disclosed to two in-house personnel of each party who are working on or who
have supervisory responsibility for this matter and have the need to know such Propriety
Information in the prosecution or defense of this action. Each party shall identify its
designated in-house personnel to the other parties prior to providing Proprietary
Information to the designated in-house personnel.
In the event that one, or more,
additional in-house representative of a party (for purposes of this subsection, “the
requesting party”) is deemed to be in a position of supervisory responsibility, and has a
10
need to know such Proprietary Information, that party shall identify the additional inhouse representative to the other parties. After receiving agreement from the other
parties, the additional in-house representative(s) may be provided with Proprietary
Information by the requesting party. In-house Representatives may not be provided with
Proprietary Information labeled “Highly Confidential—Counsel’s Eyes Only.”
6.
Entering into, agreeing to, and/or producing or receiving Proprietary Information
or otherwise complying with the terms of this Protective Order shall not:
a.
operate as an admission by any party that any particular Proprietary
Information produced by another party or non-party contains or reflects trade secrets,
proprietary or commercially sensitive information or any type of proprietary or
confidential information;
b.
operate as an admission by any party that the restrictions and procedures
set forth herein constitute adequate protection for any particular information deemed by
any party to be Proprietary Information;
c.
prejudice in any way the rights of any party to object to the production of
documents they consider not subject to discovery;
d.
prejudice in any way the rights of any party to object to the authenticity or
admissibility into evidence of any document, testimony or other evidence subject to this
Order;
11
e.
prejudice in any way the rights of a party to seek determination by the
Court whether any Proprietary Information should or should not be subject to the terms of
this Order; or
f.
prevent the parties of this Protective Order from agreeing in writing or on
the record during a deposition or hearing in this Action to alter or waive the provisions or
protections provided herein with respect to any particular Proprietary Information.
7.
Pleadings: Documents or materials designated as “Confidential” in accordance
with the terms of this Protective Order, whether discussed in briefs or otherwise, shall be filed
pursuant to D. Kan. Rule 5.4.6.
8.
Conclusion of the Litigation: Within sixty (60) days after entry of a final
judgment or dismissal with prejudice in this litigation (including appeals or petitions for review)
finally disposing of all issues raised in this litigation, Counsel and all other persons having
possession or control of another party’s Proprietary Information thereof shall provide copies of
all executed Exhibit A documents to the extent not already provided and shall: (a) return all
Proprietary Information and any copies thereof to the appropriate Counsel who produced the
Proprietary Information; or (b) destroy such Proprietary Information and all copies to the extent
it contains or is contained in any notes, summaries, digests, synopses or other document added
by Counsel or any other person after production. Each party shall give written notice of such
destruction to all Counsel. Notwithstanding the foregoing, Counsel may retain court papers,
deposition and trial transcripts and exhibits, and attorney work product (including court papers,
transcripts, and attorney work product that contains Confidential Information), provided that
such counsel, and employees of such counsel, shall not disclose any Proprietary Information
12
contained in such court papers, transcripts, exhibits, or attorney work product to any person or
entity except pursuant to a written agreement with the Producing Party.
9.
Contested Designations: A party shall not be obligated to challenge the propriety
of designating any Proprietary Information at the time such designation is made, and failure to do
so shall not preclude a subsequent challenge thereto. In the event that a party disagrees at any
stage of these proceedings with the designation by the supplying party of any information as
Proprietary Information, the parties shall try first to resolve such dispute in good faith on an
informal basis. If the dispute cannot be resolved, the objecting party may seek appropriate relief
from this Court at any time up to 60 days prior to the summary judgment deadline (and not
thereafter), but the party seeking to limit disclosure of information shall bear the burden of proof
that it should be protected as Proprietary Information. The parties may by stipulation provide for
exceptions to this Protective Order and any party may seek an order of this Court modifying this
Protective Order. This Protective Order shall be without prejudice to either party to bring before
the Court at any time the question of whether any particular information is or is not, in fact
Proprietary Information. The parties intend that information shall not be regarded as Proprietary
Information if the information:
a.
is in the public domain at the time of disclosure as a composite item of
information (e.g., customer telephone number also with composite identification as a
customer of the disclosing party, etc.);
b.
becomes part of the public domain with no breach of any obligations to or
for the benefit of the Producing Party;
13
c.
is received by the Requesting Party lawfully at a later date from a third
party without restriction as to disclosure, provided such third party has the right to make
the disclosure to the receiving party; or
d.
is information the Requesting Party can show by previously-existing
written evidence was lawfully in its possession prior to the time of disclosure.
10.
Non-waiver: The production of Documents by a party under the terms of this
Protective Order and in response to a request by the Requesting Party shall not be construed to
mean that the Producing Party has waived any objection to the production, relevancy or
admissibility of said Document. Nothing contained herein shall preclude any party from
opposing any discovery on any legitimate basis.
11.
Trial Procedures: The parties agree to jointly request that the Court implement
appropriate procedures to protect Proprietary Information which may be disclosed at the trial or
any hearing in this matter consistent with the spirit and scope of this Order.
12.
Modification: Stipulations may be made, between Counsel for the respective
parties, as to the application of this Protective Order to specific situations (e.g., documents which
are so voluminous that it would be overly burdensome to mark each page thereof individually)
provided that such stipulations are recorded in writing or contained in the record of any oral
proceeding. Nothing contained herein shall preclude any party from seeking an order of the
Court modifying or supplementing this Order.
13.
Interim Effect: This Protective Order shall be submitted to the Court for approval
and, following approval, shall continue in effect until further order of this Court. For purpose of
14
proceeding with discovery without delay, pending the Court’s approval of this Order, any
Proprietary Information produced under the terms of this Protective Order shall be protected by
the parties pursuant to these terms.
DATED this 1st day of March, 2013, at Kansas City, Kansas.
BY THE COURT:
s/ James P. O’Hara
James P. O’Hara
United States Magistrate Judge
15
Agreed to this ____ day of January, 2013:
/s/ Michael B. Hurd_______
Michael B. Hurd, KS Bar #12,521
Matthew B. Walters, KS Bar #23,514
HOVEY WILLIAMS LLP
10801 Mastin Boulevard, Suite 1000
84 Corporate Woods
Overland Park, Kansas 66210
T: (913) 647 – 9050
F: (913) 647 – 9057
mbh@hoveywilliams.com
mbw@hoveywilliams.com
ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF
DATA LOCKER INC.
/s/ David G. Seely__________
David G. Seely, #11,397
FLEESON, GOOING, COULSON &
KITCH, L.L.C. 1900 Epic Center, 301 N
Main
Wichita, KS 67202
Tel: 316-267-7361
Fax: 316-267-1754
Email: dseely@fleeson.com
Lisel M. Ferguson (Pro Hac Vice)
Procopio, Cory, Hargreaves & Savitch LLP
525 B Street, Suite 2200
San Diego, CA 92101
Tel: 619-238-1900
Fax: 619-744-5407
Email: lisel.ferguson@procopio.com
ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANTS
APRICORN, INC., LENOVO
(UNITED STATES) INC., AND LENOVO
HOLDING COMPANY, INC.
16
EXHIBIT A
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS
KANSAS CITY DIVISION
DATA LOCKER INC.
Plaintiff,
v.
Civil No. 12-cv-2630 JTM/JPO
APRICORN, INC.,
LENOVO (UNITED STATES) INC. and
LENOVO HOLDING COMPANY, INC.
Defendants.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
The undersigned acknowledges that he or she has read the Stipulated Protective Order in
the above-captioned case and agrees to be bound by its terms and that he or she consents to the
jurisdiction of the United States District Court for the District of Kansas in all matters
concerning the Stipulated Protective Order and this Acknowledgment.
(Signature)
(Printed Name)
(Date)
(Address)
(Address)
17
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?