Patton v. Entercom Kansas City, L.L.C.

Filing 20

JOINT PROTECTIVE ORDER. The court finds good cause to enter the protective order submitted by the parties. Signed by Magistrate Judge James P. O'Hara on 7/25/2013. (ah)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF KANSAS
ASHLEY PATTON,
Plaintiff,
v.
ENTERCOM KANSAS CITY, L.L.C.,
Defendant.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No. 13-CV-2186-KHV-JPO

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER
Plaintiff Ashley Patton (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant Entercom Kansas City, LLC
(“Defendant”), by and through their respective counsel, have stipulated to the terms of this Order.
The Court being fully advised of the terms and agreement herein, it is hereby ORDERED:
1.

Purpose of Order. The purpose of this Order is to prevent the disclosure of matters

deemed confidential under the terms of this Order to persons or entities other than those involved in
the prosecution or defense of this litigation and to facilitate the exchange of information between
the parties. The Order is necessary to protect both the parties and other persons from annoyance
and embarrassment. Discovery in this case may seek private information concerning both parties
and nonparties, including, for example, but not limited to, Plaintiff’s confidential medical,
psychiatric, and psychological records and other private documents regarding Plaintiff’s personal
history and conditions, as well as confidential matters concerning Defendant’s business practices
and employee personnel files. The privacy interests in such information substantially outweigh the
public’s right of access to judicial records. Good cause exists for the issuance of a protective order
under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c), including the fact that the majority of persons

1
779432v1

associated with this matter, and the above-described documents, reside or work in a relatively small
community and/or in the legal profession; and disclosure of the confidential information contained
in Plaintiff’s medical, psychiatric, and psychological records and Defendant’s business records
could potentially impact the parties’ business and personal relationships and Defendant’s trade
secrets. However, by agreeing to the entry of a protective order to govern confidential information,
the parties do not intend to waive any objections that information considered “confidential” under
this Order may not be subject to objection and withholding from disclosure on other grounds.
2.

Confidential Information.

The parties have agreed that certain categories of

documents and information, if produced or disclosed during this litigation, shall be used only for
purposes of this lawsuit and will be treated as confidential. The parties have further agreed that this
shall include, but is not necessarily limited to, information relating to the following topics:
confidential and proprietary information concerning Defendant and its business practices; the
confidential personnel and/or human resource files of any of Defendant’s current or former
employees; and medical, psychiatric, psychological, financial and/or tax records relating to Plaintiff.
3.

Designating documents and interrogatory answers as confidential. Any party

to this action may designate as “Confidential Information” a document or interrogatory answer
produced after entry of this Order by conspicuously stamping or labeling the document or
interrogatory answer with the word “Confidential.” Documents or information produced by
either party shall not be treated as confidential pursuant to this Order unless they are stamped or
labeled in such a fashion except as provided in this Order. The inadvertent failure to designate
material as “Confidential” does not preclude a party from subsequently making such a

2
779432v1

designation, and, in that case, the material is treated as confidential only after being properly
designated. Confidential Information that is set forth, summarized, or otherwise referenced in
transcripts, depositions, affidavits, exhibits, briefs, memoranda, discovery responses, pleadings
or other materials in this matter shall likewise be deemed Confidential subject to this Order.
Prior to filing or submitting to the Court any Confidential Information or any document or
exhibit that summarizes or describes the substance of any Confidential Information, the parties
agree to file a motion or application to file such documents or exhibits under seal. However, if
the Court refuses to enter such order, then the parties may file or submit any Confidential
Information or any document or exhibit that summarizes or describes the substance of any
Confidential Information to the Court.
Parties to this action may also designate deposition testimony as Confidential
Information by advising opposing counsel of record, in writing, within 15 days after receipt of
a copy of the transcript, or such other time period as may be mutually agreed upon by the
parties, of the pages and lines of the deposition which the party believes should be designated
as Confidential.

Alternatively, any party may, on the record at the deposition, designate

deposition testimony as Confidential by advising all persons present that the party believes that
the portion of the deposition in question falls under the scope of this Order.
Should counsel for any receiving party receive any particular document or information
that they believe should be designated as Confidential, counsel shall notify counsel for the
producing party in writing within five (5) days of receipt, or ten (10) days after this order has
been signed for documents previously produced, specifying with particularity the document or

3
779432v1

information designated as Confidential and such shall be treated as Confidential by all other
parties to this action.
4.

Disclosure of Confidential Information. Any documents or interrogatory answers

which are marked as Confidential are to be treated as such by the party receiving the discovery and
shall be utilized by such party only for the prosecution or defense of this case. Except as agreed
upon by the parties, or ordered by the Court, disclosure of such material or information contained
therein is limited to:
(a)

The parties;

(b)

Their counsel, and counsels’ legal and clerical assistants and staff;

(c)

Persons with prior knowledge of the documents or the Confidential Information
contained therein;

(d)

Court personnel, including court reporters, persons operating video recording
equipment at depositions, and any special master or mediator appointed by the
Court;

(e)

Any independent document reproduction services or document or video recording
and retrieval services; and

(f)

Any expert witness or outside consultant retained or consulted by the parties.

Counsel shall advise all persons to whom discovery materials are disclosed pursuant to this
paragraph of the existence of this Order, and they shall agree in writing to be bound prior to sharing
this Confidential Information with them, except court personnel shall not be required to sign any
such agreement.

4
779432v1

5.

Disputes Concerning Designation(s) of Confidential Information. In the event

that any party to this action disagrees at any stage of the proceedings with the designation of
information as Confidential, the party shall first try to resolve the matter on an informal basis. If the
dispute cannot be resolved informally, the party challenging the confidentiality of the information
may apply for appropriate relief from this Court.
6.

Binding Effect of This Order. This Order is binding upon the parties, their agents

and employees, all counsel for the parties and their agents and employees, and all persons to whom
disclosure of discovery materials or testimony are limited pursuant to the terms of this Order.
7.

Use of Confidential Information. The parties and their counsel shall exercise

reasonable care not to disclose information contained in confidential documents by placing them in
the public record in this case. If a party wishes to use any confidential information in any affidavit,
brief, memorandum, or other paper filed in this Court in this case, such paper or transcript may be
filed under seal only upon separate, specific motion and later order of the Court. The parties and
their counsel, however, have the right to use any such information contained in these documents, or
the documents themselves, in depositions and the trial of this case. The parties do not waive any
right to object at trial to the admissibility of any document, which falls under the scope of this
Order, or portion thereof, or the right to file a motion in limine regarding the use of any such
documents.
In the event any party wishes to use Confidential Information at a deposition, the
producing party may compel all persons other than the deponent, court reporter, and authorized
persons to be excused from the depositions during the time that the Confidential Information is

5
779432v1

being disclosed or discussed. At the time of the deposition or within ten (10) days after receipt
of the deposition transcript, the producing party may designate as Confidential certain portions
of the transcript, which contain or relate to Confidential Information.

All portions of

deposition transcripts shall be treated as Confidential until ten (10) days after receipt of the
deposition transcript by the producing party. If the producing party, within ten (10) days of
receipt of such designation transcript designates portions of the transcript as confidential, said
producing party shall cause the transcript to be stamped "Confidential."
8.

Return of Confidential Information. At the conclusion of this litigation the

parties’ respective counsel shall, within thirty days, and upon written request by the other party,
return all documents which fall under the scope of this Order. If respective counsel fails to make a
written request for the return of documents within thirty days of the conclusion of this litigation,
their right to do so is waived, and other counsel may destroy such records at their option. The
parties, however, retain the right to keep any documents that were admitted as exhibits in this case.
9.

Inapplicability. The restrictions set forth in any of the preceding paragraphs shall

not apply to information which:
a.

Was, is, or becomes public knowledge, not in violation of this Order;

b.

Is acquired by the parties from a third party lawfully possessing such
information, provided such information in the hands of the third party is not
itself subject to this Order or other confidentiality agreement, provision or
regulation governing disclosure of the information; or,

c.

Was lawfully possessed without an agreement to maintain it as Confidential

6
779432v1

Information by the parties prior to discovery in this case.
10.

Modifications. The parties hereto reserve all rights to apply to the Court for an

Order (a) modifying this Order; or (b) seeking further protection against discovery or other use of
Confidential Information or documents, transcripts, or materials reflecting Confidential
Information.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated July 25, 2013 at Kansas City, Kansas.
s/ James P. O’Hara
James P. O’Hara
U.S. Magistrate Judge

Jointly Submitted and Approved by:
ARTHUR BENSON & ASSOCIATES

By s/ Arthur A. Benson II
Arthur A. Benson II D. Kan. #70134
Jamie Kathryn Lansford D. Kan. #70220
4006 Central Avenue
P.O. Box 119007
Kansas City, Missouri 64171-9007
[phone]
[phone] (telefacsimile)
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
Attorneys for Plaintiff

and

7
779432v1

SEIGFREID BINGHAM, P.C.

By s/ Frederick H. Riesmeyer, II
Frederick H. Riesmeyer, II D.Kan. #70401
Shannon D. Cohorst Johnson D. Kan. #23496
911 Main Street, Suite 2800
Kansas City, Missouri 64105
[phone]
[phone] (telefacsimile)
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
Attorneys for Defendant

8
779432v1