Smart et al v. City of Wichita, Kansas et al
ORDER setting forth rulings from April 27, 2021 status conference on proposed juror questionnaire (ECF No. 286 ). Signed by Magistrate Judge James P. O'Hara on 4/27/2021. (amh)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS
THE ESTATE OF MARQUEZ SMART,
by Randall Smart and Brenda Bryant
as Administrators of the Estate of
OFFICER AARON CHAFFEE,
in his individual capacity,
Case No. 14-2111-JPO
This case is set No. 1 for jury trial in Wichita on August 16, 2021. The undersigned
U.S. Magistrate Judge, James P. O’Hara, conducted a status conference on April 27, 2021,
to discuss a draft juror questionnaire submitted by the parties (see ECF Nos. 286, 286-1).
The parties agreed on the overwhelming majority of questions, which the court highly
commends. As to the disputed portions of the draft questionnaire (ECF No. 286-1), the
court ruled as follows:
Question 9.g: Defendant’s objection sustained. This question will be eliminated.
Question 9.h: Defendant’s objection overruled.
Question 9.j: Defendant’s objection sustained. The question will be revised to read,
“Police are likely to use the same amount of force when confronting a suspect, regardless
of the suspect’s race.”
Question 9.k: Defendant’s objection sustained. This question will be eliminated.
Question 34: Defendant’s objection sustained. This question will be eliminated.
Question 36: Defendant’s objection overruled.
To be clear, the court’s rulings recited herein do not foreclose a party from inquiring
about particular issues during voir dire (or, for that matter, foreclose a party from objecting
to a particular question during voir dire).
The court will finalize the questionnaire and direct the Clerk’s Office to mail the
questionnaire to the venire.
Dated April 27, 2021, at Kansas City, Kansas.
s/ James P. O=Hara
James P. O=Hara
U.S. Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?