Brown v. Weston Transportation
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying 9 Motion for Default Judgment. Signed by District Judge Julie A. Robinson on 10/10/14. Mailed to pro se party Ronald E. Brown by certified mail. (Certified Tracking Number: 7012 3460 0000 8262 4081) (kao)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS
RONALD E. BROWN,
Case No. 14-2456-JAR
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
Plaintiff Ronald Brown, proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed this action
alleging violations under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964,1 and the Age Discrimination
in Employment Act of 1967.2 Before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion for Default Judgment
against Defendant Weston Transportation (Doc. 9). As described more fully below, Plaintiff’s
motion is denied without prejudice.
The docket shows that summons was returned executed upon Defendant by certified
mail on September 15, 2014.3 Defendant has failed to file a responsive pleading or otherwise
appear in this action. Plaintiff moves for entry of default judgment against Defendant in the
amount of $75,000, to be paid within forty-five days.
The Court finds that Plaintiff’s motion must be denied. Plaintiff has failed to comply
with the two-step process contemplated by Fed. R. Civ. P. 55. Plaintiff must first apply to the
42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq.
29 U.S.C. § 621 et seq.
Docs. 3 and 4.
clerk for entry of default under subsection (a) which states that “[w]hen a party against whom a
judgment for affirmative relief is sought has failed to plead or otherwise defend, and that failure
is shown by affidavit or otherwise, the clerk must enter the party’s default.”4 If the clerk enters a
default, plaintiff may then file a motion for default judgment under Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(b).5 “A
plaintiff may not seek default judgment before it has applied for entry of default.”6 Accordingly,
the motion is premature and must be denied.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion for Default Judgment against
Defendant Weston Transportation (Doc. 9) is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: October 10, 2014
S/ Julie A. Robinson
JULIE A. ROBINSON
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Christenson Media Group, Inc. v. Lang Indus., Inc., 782 F. Supp. 2d 1213, 1222 (D. Kan. 2011) (citing
Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(a)).
Id. at 1223 (citations omitted).
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?