Salem v. Salem et al

Filing 6

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 5 Report and Recommendations. All of plaintiff's cases are dismissed with prejudice. Plaintiff is also restricted from filing new complaint(s), unless the conditions set forth in this order have been met. Signed by District Judge Carlos Murguia on 04/24/2015. Mailed to pro se party Skylar Hesson Salem by regular and certified mail; Certified Tracking Number: 7012-3460-0000-8262-1646. (sv)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS

SKYLAR HESSON SALEM,
Plaintiff,
v.
THE STATE OF KANSAS,
Defendant.
_______________________________
SKYLAR HESSON SALEM,
Plaintiff,
v.
COMPASS,
SOUTHWEST CASE, and
THE STATE OF KANSAS,
Defendants.
_______________________________

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

)
)
Plaintiff,
)
v.
)
)
GRAY COUNTY KANSAS SHERIFF )
and THE STATE OF KANSAS,
)
)
Defendants.
)
_______________________________ )

Case No. 15-2209-CM

Case No. 15-2285-CM

SKYLAR HESSON SALEM,

)
)
Plaintiff,
)
v.
)
)
GRAY COUNTY SHERIFF
)
DEPARTMENT, JEFF SHARP, and )

Case No. 15-2289-CM

SKYLAR HESSON SALEM,

Case No. 15-2307-CM

-1-

THE STATE OF KANSAS,
Defendants.
_______________________________
SKYLAR HESSON SALEM,
Plaintiff,
v.
ERIC HARMAN and
THE STATE OF KANSAS,
Defendants.
_______________________________
SKYLAR HESSON SALEM,
Plaintiff,
v.
JOSEPH SALEM and
H.E. SALEM CORPORATION,
Defendants.
_______________________________

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

)
)
Plaintiff,
)
v.
)
)
SHAWNEE POLICE DEPARTMENT )
and JOHNSON COUNTY SHERRIFF )
DEPARTMENT,
)
)
Defendants.
)
_______________________________ )

Case No. 15-2309-CM

Case No. 15-2310-CM

SKYLAR HESSON SALEM,

SKYLAR HESSON SALEM,
Plaintiff,
v.

)
)
)
)

Case No. 15-2311-CM

Case No. 15-2312-CM

-2-

MEADE COUNTY JAIL and
THE STATE OF KANSAS,
Defendants.
_______________________________
SKYLAR HESSON SALEM,
Plaintiff,
v.
TIFFONY GASSELING,
THE STATE OF KANSAS, and
KANSAS DEPARTMENT OF
CORRECTIONS,
Defendants.
_______________________________
SKYLAR HESSON SALEM,
Plaintiff,
v.
JOSEPH E. SALEM, and
H.E. SALEM CORPORATION,
Defendants.
_______________________________
SKYLAR HESSON SALEM,
Plaintiff,
v.
FRED BALTHAZOR,
THE STATE OF KANSAS,
KANSAS DEPARTMENT OF
CORRECTIONS, R.J. COOK, and
TIFFONY GASSELING,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No. 15-2313-CM

Case No. 15-2320-CM

Case No. 15-2321-CM

-3-

_______________________________

)

SKYLAR HESSON SALEM,

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Plaintiff,
v.
KANSAS CITY, MISSOURI,
POLICE DEPARTMENT,
Defendant.
_______________________________
SKYLAR HESSON SALEM,
Plaintiff,
v.
WALMART,
Defendant.
_______________________________
SKYLAR HESSON SALEM,
Plaintiff,
v.
JOSEPH SALEM and
H.E. SALEM CORPORATION,
Defendants.
_______________________________
SKYLAR HESSON SALEM,
Plaintiff,
v.
JIM KRAMER and
THE STATE OF KANSAS,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No. 15-2588-CM

Case No. 15-2590-CM

Case No. 15-2607-CM

Case No. 15-2608-CM

-4-

_______________________________

)

SKYLAR HESSON SALEM,

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Plaintiff,
v.
DORALYN DAY and
STATE OF MISSOURI,
Defendants.
_______________________________

)
)
Plaintiff,
)
v.
)
)
STACY PYLE and NATHAN PYLE, )
)
Defendants.
)
_______________________________ )

Case No. 15-2609-CM

SKYLAR HESSON SALEM,

SKYLAR HESSON SALEM,
Plaintiff,
v.
JUDITH WALDRON,
Defendant.
_______________________________
SKYLAR HESSON SALEM,
Plaintiff,
v.
VALLEY VIEW BANK and
BANCABILITY,
Defendants.
_______________________________

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No. 15-2622-CM

Case No. 15-2627-CM

Case No. 15-2637-CM

-5-

SKYLAR HESSON SALEM,
Plaintiff,
v.
McDONALDS,
Defendant.
_______________________________
SKYLAR HESSON SALEM,
Plaintiff,
v.
SHAWNEE POLICE
DEPARTMENT,
Defendant.
_______________________________
SKYLAR HESSON SALEM,
Plaintiff,
v.
CHEX SYSTEMS, INC.
Defendant.
_______________________________
SKYLAR HESSON SALEM,
Plaintiff,
v.
CAPITAL ONE,
Defendant.
_______________________________
SKYLAR HESSON SALEM,

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No. 15-2638-CM

Case No. 15-2641-CM

Case No. 15-2644-CM

Case No. 15-2645-CM

)
)

-6-

Plaintiff,
v.
VALLEY VIEW BANK and
BANCABILITY,
Defendants.
_______________________________
SKYLAR HESSON SALEM,
Plaintiff,
v.
JOSEPH SALEM and
H.E. SALEM CORPORATION,
Defendants.
_______________________________
SKYLAR HESSON SALEM,
Plaintiff,
v.
KANSAS BUREAU OF
INVESTIGATION,
Defendant.
_______________________________
SKYLAR HESSON SALEM,
Plaintiff,
v.
MERRIAM POLICE
DEPARTMENT,
Defendant.
_______________________________

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No. 15-2647-CM

Case No. 15-2648-CM

Case No. 15-2653-CM

Case No. 15-2654-CM

-7-

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
This matter is before the court on the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate
Judge James P. O’Hara. Plaintiff is not represented by counsel and the Report and Recommendation
was mailed to him at his last known address on March 26, 2015.1 No objections to Magistrate Judge
O’Hara’s Report and Recommendation have been filed, and the time for doing so has expired. See
Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). The court has reviewed the thorough Report and Recommendation filed by
Magistrate Judge O’Hara. Based upon that review and the fact that no objection has been filed to it,
the court accepts, adopts and affirms the Report and Recommendation in its entirety. As
recommended by Magistrate Judge O’Hara, the court also imposes the following filing restrictions on
plaintiff:
Salem is prohibited from filing another complaint at this courthouse, unless he is
represented by counsel.
Salem may only file a pro se complaint or document after he provides a notarized
affidavit that verifies in paragraph form, with particularity, how the contemplated
complaint entitles him to relief. The affidavit must provide notice of the restriction and
must provide a copy of the proposed complaint as an exhibit.
Upon compliance with the above stated requirements, the court will review the affidavit
and the proposed filing to determine whether it should be accepted for filing. If Salem
attempts to file any complaint or document that fails to comply with these restrictions, the
Clerk of the Court is directed not to accept and/or file the document.

Accordingly, and after reviewing the file de novo, IT IS ORDERED that the Report and
Recommendation issued by United States Magistrate Judge James P. O’Hara on March 26, 2015 is
ACCEPTED, ADOPTED and AFFIRMED. All of plaintiff’s cases are dismissed with prejudice.
Plaintiff is also restricted from filing new complaint(s), unless the conditions set forth in this order
have been met.

1

This was the same mailing address to which Magistrate Judge O’Hara’s Notice of Hearing and Order to Show Cause were
sent via certified mail, the receipt of which was confirmed on March 11, 2015. (See Docs. 15 & 16.)

-8-

These cases are now closed.
Dated this 24th day of April, 2015, at Kansas City, Kansas.
s/ Carlos Murguia
CARLOS MURGUIA
United States District Judge

-9-