Signature Marketing, Inc. v. New Frontier Armory, LLC et al

Filing 19

JOINT PROTECTIVE ORDER. The court finds good cause to enter the proposed order submitted by the parties. Signed by Magistrate Judge James P. O'Hara on 6/15/2015. (ah)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS SIGNATURE MARKETING, INC. d/b/a SIGNATURE MANUFACTURING, ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) NEW FRONTIER ARMORY, LLC ) ) and ) ) EXTAR, LLC, ) ) Defendants. ) Case No.: 15-7200-JWL Civil Action JOINT PROTECTIVE ORDER WHEREAS, the parties have requested documents through discovery and mandatory Rule 26 disclosures that are believed to contain confidential business information and other trade secret information for which the disclosure is necessary to resolve the issues of this litigation; and WHEREAS, confidential business information and trade secret information should be given the protection of an Order of this Court in order to prevent injury through disclosure to persons or other business entities who may have an interest in this information; IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. All e-mails between and among the parties, all pricing information and all drawings and/or plan specifications for firearms or firearm parts that have or will be exchanged between the parties are deemed confidential information upon production of documents by any party in response to Request for Production or otherwise as required. This confidential information shall be disclosed only to the Court, the parties and counsel of record and their 1 clerical personnel. Any confidential information may also be disclosed to other persons whose assistance is required by counsel in conducting this litigation, but may not be used or disclosed by such other persons for any purpose not directly related to participation in the above-styled case, or any appeals or related alternative dispute resolution taken or filed in connection therewith; all copies of confidential information and all notes setting forth or revealing confidential information in the possession of such other persons shall be destroyed or returned to the party which originally produced the same within 90 days of the final adjudication, including, but not limited to, final adjudication of any appeals or petitions for extraordinary writs. Counsel should not otherwise offer or permit any disclosure of any confidential document, its contents, or any portion or summary thereof. 2. Persons having knowledge of confidential information by virtue of their participation in the conduct of this litigation shall use them for that purpose only and shall not disclose the confidential information or any portion or summary thereof, to any person or persons not involved in the conduct of the litigation. 3. Counsel for the parties shall exercise all reasonable care not to needlessly disclose such confidential information in the public record of this proceeding. 4. In the event confidential information is deposited with the Court, the party must first seek leave to file a document under seal or obtain the agreement of opposing counsel. 5. Within 90 days of the final adjudication, including, but not limited to, final adjudication of any appeals or petitions for extraordinary writs, all copies or confidential documents or summaries thereof produced to the other side, which are in the actual or constructive custody of defendant or plaintiff, shall be returned to the opposing side which produced the same, and each party shall file with the Court a certification affirming that all 2 confidential information in its actual or constructive custody has been returned to the producing party or destroyed. 6. In the event that a party or counsel inadvertently discloses or produces document(s) subject to a claim of privilege or of protection under the terms of this Order, said party or counsel may, when such failure is discovered, notify the party that received the information of the claim and the basis for it. After being notified, the notified party must promptly return, sequester, or destroy the specified information and any copies it has; must not use or disclose the information; must take reasonable steps to retrieve the information if the party disclosed it prior to being notified; and may promptly present the information to the court under seal for a determination of the claim. The producing party must preserve the information until the claim is resolved. IT IS SO ORDERED. ___June 15, 2015___ Date __James P. O'Hara__________ U.S. Magistrate Judge 3 Respectfully submitted, SMITHYMAN & ZAKOURA, CHD. s/Constance L. Shidler Constance L. Shidler 750 Commerce Plaza II 7400 West 110th Street Overland Park, KS 66210 ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFF/ COUNTERCLAIM-DEFENDANT and FOLAND, WICKENS, EISFELDER, ROPER & HOFER, P.C. s/Patrick J. Allegri ROBERT H. HOUSKE #14411 PATRICK J. ALLEGRI #25189 911 Main Street, 30th Floor Kansas City, Missouri 64105 (816) 472-7474; Fax: (816) 472-6262 ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANTS/ COUNTERCLAIM-PLAINTIFFS 4

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?