Farr v. Davis et al
ORDER adopting in full the Magistrate Judge's 68 Report and Recommendations. Further, denying Plaintiff's 46 Motion for Leave to Join Additional Defendants. Signed by District Judge Carlos Murguia on 05/04/2017. (mg)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS
JOAN E. FARR,
DARYL DAVIS, et al.,
Case No. 16-2180-CM
Plaintiff Joan E. Farr brings this action pro se, claiming that defendants violated her
constitutional rights under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff claims that defendants conspired to deprive her
of her rights by stealing her property and influencing the police to harass plaintiff. The case is before
the court on plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to Join Additional Defendants (Doc. 46). Magistrate Judge
Kenneth G. Gale issued a Report and Recommendation (Doc. 68), recommending that this court deny
plaintiff’s motion. Plaintiff failed to timely object to the Report and Recommendation. The court has
reviewed the Report and Recommendation, and agrees with Judge Gale that plaintiff’s request should
be denied for both procedural and substantive reasons.
The court ADOPTS the Report and
Recommendation (Doc. 68) in full, and denies plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to Join Additional
Defendants (Doc. 46).
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of Judge Gale (Doc.
68) is adopted in full.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to Join Additional Defendants
(Doc. 46) is denied.
Dated this 4th day of May, 2017, at Kansas City, Kansas.
s/ Carlos Murguia__________
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?