Mann v. Con-Way Freight, Inc.
SECOND AMENDED SCHEDULING ORDER and ORDER granting #88 joint motion to amend scheduling order. Discovery deadline 8/1/2017. Dispositive motion deadline 9/7/2017. Proposed Pretrial Order due by 8/8/2017. Final Pretrial Conference set for 8/17/2017 at 01:00 PM in KC Courtroom 223 (JPO) before Magistrate Judge James P. O'Hara. Jury Trial set for 4/2/2018 at 09:00 AM in KC Courtroom 463 (CM) before District Judge Carlos Murguia. Signed by Magistrate Judge James P. O'Hara on 4/11/2017. (amh)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS
ANTHONY CRAIG MANN,
CON-WAY FREIGHT, INC.,
Case No. 16-2196-CM
SECOND AMENDED SCHEDULING ORDER
The parties have filed a joint motion (ECF No. 88) to amend the scheduling order
(ECF Nos. 10, 39). For good cause shown, the motion is granted and the scheduling order
is amended as follows:1
All discovery shall be commenced or served in time to be completed by August
The final pretrial conference is rescheduled from June 1, 2017, to August 17,
2017, at 1:00 p.m., in the U.S. Courthouse, Room 223, 500 State Avenue, Kansas City,
Kansas. Unless otherwise notified, the undersigned magistrate judge will conduct the
conference. No later than August 8, 2017, defendant shall submit the parties’ proposed
To accommodate the court’s schedule, the extensions granted are not quite as long
as requested by the parties.
The deadline for potentially dispositive motions is September 7, 2017.
After consulting with the presiding judge, the trial is re-set on a trial calendar
that will begin on April 2, 2018, at 9:00 a.m.
All other provisions of the original scheduling order shall remain in effect. The
schedule adopted in this second amended scheduling order shall not be modified except by
leave of court upon a showing of good cause.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated April 11, 2017, at Kansas City, Kansas.
s/ James P. O’Hara
James P. O’Hara
U.S. Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?