MW Builders, Inc. v. Fire Protection Group, Inc.
SECOND AMENDED SCHEDULING ORDER and ORDER granting 48 joint motion to extend deadlines. Discovery deadline 12/27/2017. Dispositive motion deadline 2/16/2018. Proposed Pretrial Order due by 1/12/2018. Final Pretrial Conference set for 1/22/2018 at 09:00 AM in KC Courtroom 223 (JPO) before Magistrate Judge James P. O'Hara. Signed by Magistrate Judge James P. O'Hara on 7/28/2017. (amh)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS
MW BUILDERS, INC.,
Case No. 16-2340-JAR
FIRE PROTECTION GROUP, INC.,
SECOND AMENDED SCHEDULING ORDER
The parties have filed a joint motion (ECF No. 48) to amend the scheduling order
in this case.1 The court finds good cause to grant the motion and amend the scheduling
order. However, although the parties specifically assert that the June 12, 2018 trial
setting will not be affected by the requested extensions, the trial setting is tied to the
dispositive motion deadline, i.e., the court must schedule enough time for such motions to
be fully briefed and decided prior to trial. Accordingly, with the consent of the presiding
U.S. District Judge, the trial setting is reset and the scheduling order is amended as
SUMMARY OF DEADLINES AND SETTINGS
All discovery completed
All other potentially dispositive motions (e.g., summary
December 27, 2017
February 16, 2018
ECF Nos. 7 & 25.
Motions challenging admissibility of expert testimony
45 days before trial
Proposed pretrial order due
January 12, 2018
January 22, 2018, at 9:00 a.m.
October 23, 2018, at 9:00 a.m.
All other provisions of the original and amended scheduling orders shall remain in
effect. The schedule adopted in this second amended scheduling order shall not be
modified except by leave of court upon a showing of good cause.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated July 28, 2017, at Kansas City, Kansas.
s/ James P. O’Hara
James P. O’Hara
U.S. Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?