Williams v. CoreCivic, Inc. et al

Filing 29

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting 26 Motion to Compel. The Court grants the motion for good cause and orders Plaintiff within fourteen (14) days, i.e. on or before January 23, 2018, to serve upon Defendants initial disclosures that fully comply with F ed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1)(A). The Court further orders Plaintiff by January 23, 2018, to respond to any outstanding interrogatories and requests for production. See order for additional details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Gerald L. Rushfelt on 01/09/2018. (tvn)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS KENNETH W. WILLIAMS, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 17-CV-2310-JAR-GLR CORECIVIC, INC., et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER On this 9th day of January 2018, the above-captioned action comes before the Court for hearing upon Defendants CoreCivic, Inc. and CoreCivic of Tennessee, LLC’s Motion to Compel Plaintiff’s Rule 26 Disclosures (ECF 26). Plaintiff appears by Gerald Gray, his attorney. Defendants appear by Anne Benton Hucker and Karen Kessler Cain, their attorneys. After giving due consideration to the motion and hearing oral arguments by counsel, the Court grants the motion for good cause and orders Plaintiff within fourteen (14) days, i.e. on or before January 23, 2018, to serve upon Defendants initial disclosures that fully comply with Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1)(A). The Court further orders Plaintiff by January 23, 2018, to respond to any outstanding interrogatories and requests for production. The Court finds that Plaintiff has moved from the Kansas City area to Texas, that he consequently has encountered difficulty in locating documents he needed to prepare his initial disclosures, and that these circumstances would make it unjust to enter against him an award of expenses. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated January 9, 2018, at Kansas City, Kansas. S/ Gerald L. Rushfelt Gerald L. Rushfelt U.S. Magistrate Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?