Ross v. Jenkins et al

Filing 192

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting 185 plaintiff's Second Motion to Disburse Garnished Funds Deposited into the Registry of the Court by Bank of America, N.A. Signed by District Judge Daniel D. Crabtree on 04/10/2019. (mig)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS

KENDRA ROSS,
Plaintiff,
Case No. 17-2547-DDC-TJJ
v.
ROYALL JENKINS, et al.,
Defendants.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
This matter is before the court on plaintiff Kendra Ross’s Second Motion to Disburse
Garnished Funds Deposited into the Registry of the Court by Bank of America, N.A. (Doc. 185).
For reasons explained below, the court grants plaintiff’s Motion.
On May 23, 2018, the court entered default judgment in the amount of about $7.9 million
against defendants Royall Jenkins, The Value Creators, Inc. f/k/a The United Nation of Islam,
Inc., The Value Creators LLC, and The Value Creators, Inc. See Doc. 41. Trying to collect her
judgment, plaintiff applied for several Writs of Garnishment to various banks; some of those
banks have deposited funds with the court into a non-income-earning and non-interest-bearing
account. Docs. 48, 49, 50, 51, 54, 56, 58, 59, 72, 73, 79, & 82 (Applications for Writs of
Garnishment, Orders issuing Writs of Garnishment, and Orders granting plaintiff’s Motions to
Deposit Funds under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 67). Specifically, garnishee Bank of
America, N.A. (“Bank of America”) has deposited $5,359.12 with the court from nine accounts.
And, on February 27, 2019, the court granted plaintiff’s first Motion for Disbursement of Funds
(Doc. 163) in the amount of $3,103.68 from seven of the nine Bank of America accounts. See
Doc. 175. In that Motion, plaintiff informed the court that she planned to confirm with Bank of

America that the other two accounts from which funds were deposited had no joint tenants.
Afterward, she explained, she planned to seek disbursement of the remaining funds.
Plaintiff’s most recent Motion asks the court to disburse the funds from the two
remaining accounts. She represents that the account numbers for these two accounts at Bank of
America—from which the bank deposited $2,345.44 with the court—have the same four
terminal digits as accounts maintained by judgment debtor Royall Jenkins. She also represents
that the remaining two accounts have no joint tenants. Plaintiff asserts that she provided Mr.
Jenkins with notice of the garnishment action, but he has failed to respond.
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 67(b), D. Kan. Rule 67.1(d)(1), and 28 U.S.C. §§ 2041
and 2042 authorize the court to distribute funds that have been deposited with the court. Here,
plaintiff’s judgment remains unsatisfied. And, no judgment debtor has responded to plaintiff’s
notice of garnishment about the accounts she has identified as containing the judgment debtors’
funds. The court thus grants plaintiff’s Second Motion to Disburse Garnished Funds (Doc. 185).
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED BY THE COURT THAT plaintiff’s Second Motion
to Disburse Garnished Funds Deposited into the Registry of the Court by Bank of America, N.A.
(Doc. 185) is granted.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated this 10th day of April, 2019, at Kansas City, Kansas.
s/ Daniel D. Crabtree
Daniel D. Crabtree
United States District Judge

2