Bradshaw v. Estate of Paul Bradshaw et al

Filing 10

ORDER denying 9 motion to join additional parties. Signed by Magistrate Judge James P. O'Hara on 11/27/2017. Mailed to pro se party by regular mail. (amh)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS

ROD BRADSHAW,
Plaintiff,
v.
ESTATE OF PAUL BRADSHAW, et al.,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No. 17-2578-JTM

ORDER
Before the court is plaintiff’s motion to join additional parties (ECF No. 9). The
motion is denied because plaintiff has failed to identify the persons he seeks to join as parties
and, as to each of those persons, whether he seeks joinder under Fed. R. Civ. P. 19 (on the
contention that the person is a required party) or under Fed. R. Civ. P. 20 (on the contention
that the person may be joined).
Plaintiff is hereby informed that, within 14 days after he is served with a copy of this
order, he may, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 72 and D. Kan. Rule 72.1.4(a), file written
objections to this order by filing a motion to review this order. Plaintiff must file any
objections within the 14-day period if he wants to have appellate review of this order. If
plaintiff does not timely file his objections, no court will allow appellate review.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated November 27, 2017, at Kansas City, Kansas.

O:\ORDERS\17-2578-JTM-9.wpd

s/ James P. O’Hara
James P. O’Hara
U. S. Magistrate Judge

O:\ORDERS\17-2578-JTM-9.wpd

-2-