Bradshaw v. Estate of Paul Bradshaw et al

Filing 10

ORDER denying 9 motion to join additional parties. Signed by Magistrate Judge James P. O'Hara on 11/27/2017. Mailed to pro se party by regular mail. (amh)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS ROD BRADSHAW, Plaintiff, v. ESTATE OF PAUL BRADSHAW, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 17-2578-JTM ORDER Before the court is plaintiff’s motion to join additional parties (ECF No. 9). The motion is denied because plaintiff has failed to identify the persons he seeks to join as parties and, as to each of those persons, whether he seeks joinder under Fed. R. Civ. P. 19 (on the contention that the person is a required party) or under Fed. R. Civ. P. 20 (on the contention that the person may be joined). Plaintiff is hereby informed that, within 14 days after he is served with a copy of this order, he may, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 72 and D. Kan. Rule 72.1.4(a), file written objections to this order by filing a motion to review this order. Plaintiff must file any objections within the 14-day period if he wants to have appellate review of this order. If plaintiff does not timely file his objections, no court will allow appellate review. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated November 27, 2017, at Kansas City, Kansas. O:\ORDERS\17-2578-JTM-9.wpd s/ James P. O’Hara James P. O’Hara U. S. Magistrate Judge O:\ORDERS\17-2578-JTM-9.wpd -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?