Ensminger v. Credit Law Center, LLC a/k/a Thomas Andrew Addleman L.L.C., d/b/a Credit Law Center et al

Filing 131

TENTH AMENDED SCHEDULING ORDER granting 130 unopposed motion to amend the scheduling order. No further extensions of the subject deadlines will be granted absent a showing of truly exceptional circumstances. Signed by Magistrate Judge James P. O'Hara on 2/17/2021. (amh)

Download PDF
Case 2:19-cv-02147-TC-JPO Document 131 Filed 02/17/21 Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS MARK ENSMINGER, on behalf of himself and those similarly situated, Plaintiff, Case No. 19-2147-TC v. CREDIT LAW CENTER, LLC, et al., Defendants. TENTH AMENDED SCHEDULING ORDER Defendant has filed an unopposed motion (ECF No. 130) to amend the scheduling order originally filed on June 17, 2019 (ECF No. 26). Because defendant has demonstrated exceptional circumstances (i.e., family medical issues) exist for amending the scheduling order yet again, the motion is granted, and the scheduling order is amended as follows: a) Disclosures required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2), including reports from retained experts, must be served by defendant by March 10, 2021; disclosures and reports by any rebuttal experts must be served by April 9, 2021. b) Any motion for class certification must be filed by May 11, 2021. All other provisions of the original scheduling order shall remain in effect. As this is the sixth extension of the subject deadlines, no further extensions will be granted absent a showing of truly exceptional circumstances. The parties and their retained expert should proceed with this warning in mind. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated February 17, 2021, at Kansas City, Kansas. O:\SCHEDULINGORDERS\19-2147-JWL-130.DOCX Case 2:19-cv-02147-TC-JPO Document 131 Filed 02/17/21 Page 2 of 2 s/ James P. O=Hara James P. O=Hara U.S. Magistrate Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?