Tiumalu v. Garden City Community College et al
ORDER granting 46 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer the 7 Amended Complaint; granting 47 Motion for Leave to File Answer instanter. All Defendants' Answers due 6/11/21. Signed by Magistrate Judge Gwynne E. Birzer on 6/4/21. (adc)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS
GARDEN CITY COMMUNITY COLLEGE,
Case No. 20-2193-KHV-GEB
This matter is before the Court on Defendants’ motion for a two-week extension of
the time to Answer Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint (ECF No. 46), and its later Motion to
file its Answer instanter (ECF No. 47). Defendants’ motion for extension was filed May
20, 2021, making Plaintiff’s response deadline June 3, 2021. No response was filed by June
3, and as such the Court may grant the motion (ECF No. 46) as uncontested without further
notice pursuant to D. Kan. Rule 7.4(b). Additionally, in its discretion, the Court finds good
cause for the extension.
Because the Court grants Defendants’ request for extension herein, it follows that
Defendants are permitted to file their Answer. Therefore, Defendants’ motion to file its
Answer instanter (ECF No. 47) is also granted without further briefing.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendants’ motion for a two-week
extension of the time to Answer Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint (ECF No. 46) is
GRANTED, and Defendants’ Motion to file its Answer instanter (ECF No. 47) is likewise
GRANTED. Defendants shall file its Answer using the Court’s ECF system no later than
June 11, 2021.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated at Wichita, Kansas this 4th day of June, 2021.
s/ Gwynne E. Birzer
GWYNNE E. BIRZER
United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?