Beecham v. Spectrum Brands et al
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting 10 Defendant Spectrum Brands, Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint. Signed by District Judge J. Thomas Marten on 1/6/2021. Mailed to pro se party Tawana M. Beecham at 1308 E 81st St. KCMO 64131 by regular mail. (mam)
Case 2:20-cv-02327-JTM-JPO Document 11 Filed 01/06/21 Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS
TAWANA M. BEECHAM,
SPECTRUM BRANDS, INC., et al.,
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
This matter is before the court on defendant Spectrum Brands’ Motion to Dismiss
(Dkt. 10), which argues relief cannot be granted to the pro se plaintiff because (1) the
Complaint is untimely, (2) plaintiff has failed to properly serve any defendant, and (3)
the Complaint fails to state a plausible claim for relief. More than four months have
elapsed since defendant’s August 19, 2020 Motion to Dismiss, and the plaintiff has not
filed any response to the motion, or asked for additional time to attempt a response.
Accordingly, both for good cause shown and pursuant to D.Kan.R. 7.4,1 defendant’s
motion (Dkt. 10) is hereby granted.
IT IS SO ORDERED this day of January, 2021.
J. Thomas Marten
J. Thomas Marten, Judge
The Rule provides if a timely response (here, 21 days) “the court will consider and decide the motion as
an uncontested motion. Ordinarily, the court will grant the motion without further notice.”
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?