Consumer Financial Protection Bureau v. Integrity Advance, LLC et al
Filing
21
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - It is ordered that Consumer Financial Protection Bureau's petition seeking an order and judgment enforcing its own Final Order of January 11, 2021 1 , that imposed obligations on respondents Integrity Advance, LLC andJames Carnes is hereby granted; respondents are ordered to comply with the Final Order, and judgment shall be entered accordingly. Signed by District Judge John W. Lungstrum on 07/30/2021. (ses)
Case 2:21-mc-00206-JWL-JPO Document 21 Filed 07/30/21 Page 1 of 4
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS
CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION
BUREAU,
)
)
)
Petitioner,
)
)
v.
)
)
INTEGRITY ADVANCE, LLC and
)
JAMES R. CARNES,
)
)
Respondents.
)
)
_______________________________________)
Case No. 21-mc-206-JWL
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
In this miscellaneous case, petitioner Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (“the
Bureau”) seeks an order and judgment enforcing its own Final Order of January 11, 2021,
that imposed obligations on respondents Integrity Advance, LLC (“Integrity”) and James
Carnes (“the Final Order”). The Court grants the petition.
In the Final Order, the Bureau ordered respondents to pay restitution in the amount
of $38,453,341.62; Integrity to pay a civil penalty of $7,500,000; and Mr. Carnes to pay a
civil penalty of $5,000,000. Respondents were ordered to pay those amounts within 30
days, but the Final Order further provided that if respondents appealed the decision to the
Tenth Circuit, they could instead pay those amounts to an escrow account within 30 days.
The Final Order also required respondents to “cooperate in assisting the Bureau in
Case 2:21-mc-00206-JWL-JPO Document 21 Filed 07/30/21 Page 2 of 4
determining the identity, location, and amount of restitution due to each consumer entitled
to redress.”
It is undisputed that respondents have not paid the restitution or civil penalty
amounts either to the Bureau or to an escrow account as required by the Final Order. The
Bureau has thus filed a petition in this Court seeking enforcement of its Final Order. The
Court previously ordered respondents to show cause why the petition should not be
granted. Mr. Carnes filed a response brief, to which the Bureau replied. Integrity did not
respond to the show cause order, and no attorney has entered an appearance in this matter
on its behalf; thus Integrity does not oppose the relief sought by the Bureau. On July 27,
2021, the Court conducted a telephone hearing at which the Court heard argument on the
petition from counsel for the Bureau and counsel for Mr. Carnes, and the Court is now
prepared to rule.
12 U.S.C. § 5563 authorizes the Bureau to conduct proceedings to enforce consumer
protection laws. See id. § 5563(a), (b). Any party to such a proceeding may appeal an
order issued by the Bureau to a federal court of appeals, which court shall have exclusive
jurisdiction to affirm, modify, terminate, or set aside (in whole or in part) the order. See
id. § 5563(b)(4). The commencement of such an appeal does not operate as a stay of the
Bureau’s order unless such a stay is specifically authorized by the appellate court. See id.
§ 5563(b)(5). Respondents appealed the Final Order to the Tenth Circuit pursuant to this
provision, and that appeal is presently being briefed by the parties; respondents did not
seek a stay of the Final Order from that court, however.
2
Case 2:21-mc-00206-JWL-JPO Document 21 Filed 07/30/21 Page 3 of 4
Section 5563 further provides that the Bureau may apply to a federal district court
for enforcement of any effective and outstanding order, which court “shall have jurisdiction
and power to order and require compliance therewith.” See id. § 5563(d)(1). The statute
further provides: “Except as provided in this subsection, no court shall have jurisdiction
to affect by injunction or otherwise the issuance or enforcement of any notice or order or
to review, modify, suspend, terminate, or set aside any such notice or order [by the
Bureau].” See id. § 5563(d)(2). The Bureau seeks an order of enforcement from this Court
pursuant to Section 5563(d).
In opposition to the petition, Mr. Carnes argues that the Bureau’s Final Order is not
valid and enforceable. He concedes that the statute allows only the Tenth Circuit to address
that argument and that he is not permitted to argue the merits to this Court. He therefore
requests instead that this Court, as gatekeeper, exercise its discretion to delay its resolution
of the petition so that the Tenth Circuit may have time to hear respondents’ appeal. As set
forth above, however, Section 5563 does not permit this Court to stay enforcement of or
suspend the Final Order, and Mr. Carnes’s request for a delay is tantamount to a request
for just such a stay or suspension.
Respondents do not dispute that they were served with the Final Order (which they
then appealed to the Tenth Circuit) or that they have not complied fully with it. Section
5563 authorizes this Court only to enforce the Final Order, and the power to suspend the
Final Order or stay its enforcement rests only with the Tenth Circuit. Mr. Carnes has not
cited any authority indicating that this Court may or should refuse to grant a petition for
enforcement under this statute.
3
Case 2:21-mc-00206-JWL-JPO Document 21 Filed 07/30/21 Page 4 of 4
Accordingly, the Court grants the petition for enforcement of the Final Order, and
respondents are hereby ordered to comply with the Final Order by paying the restitution
and civil penalties imposed and by cooperating as directed. Judgment will be entered in
favor of the Bureau to that effect, which judgment shall incorporate the Bureau’s Final
Order.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED BY THE COURT THAT Consumer Financial
Protection Bureau’s petition seeking an order and judgment enforcing its own Final Order
of January 11, 2021, that imposed obligations on respondents Integrity Advance, LLC and
James Carnes is hereby granted; respondents are ordered to comply with the Final Order,
and judgment shall be entered accordingly.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated this 30th day of July, 2021, in Kansas City, Kansas.
s/ John W. Lungstrum
John W. Lungstrum
United States District Judge
4
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?