Securities and Exchange Commission v. Tanner et al

Filing 424

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting 423 Receiver's Seventeenth Application for Approval of Payment of Professional Fees and Expenses. The Receiver is authorized to pay Larry E. Cook the sum of $15,063.75 for fees and expenses incurred through November 30, 2008. The Receiver is further authorized to pay Lathrop & Gage L.C. the sum of $3,616.35 for fees and expenses incurred through November 30, 2008. Signed by District Judge Richard D. Rogers on 12/29/08. (ms)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS SECURITIES EXCHANGE COMMISSION ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) DAVID TANNER, et al., ) ) Defendants, ) ) and ) ) MARGARET F. SPENCER, et al., ) ) Relief Defendants. Civil Action No.: 05-4057-RDR MEMORANDUM AND ORDER This matter is presently before the court upon the Receiver's Application for Approval of Payment of Receiver's Professional Fees and Expenses. The Receiver seeks to pay Larry E. Cook expenses in the amount $0 and fees in the amount of $15,063.75, for a total amount of $15,063.75. The Receiver also seeks to pay Lathrop & Gage, L.C., attorneys for the Receiver, expenses in the amount of -$57.65 and fees in the amount of $3,674 for a total amount of $3,616.35. There has been no timely opposition filed to this application. Accordingly, for good cause shown, the Application shall be granted. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Receiver's Seventeenth Application for Approval of Payment of Professional Fees and Expenses (Doc. # 423) be and hereby is granted. The Receiver is authorized to pay Larry E. Cook the sum of $15,063.75 for fees and expenses incurred through November 30, 2008. The Receiver is further authorized to pay Lathrop & Gage L.C. the sum of $3,616.35 for fees and expenses incurred through November 30, 2008. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated this 29th day of December, 2008 at Topeka, Kansas. s/Richard D. Rogers United States District Judge 2 CC 2063438v1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?