Parrish v. Larned State Hospital et al

Filing 6

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ENTERED: This matter is dismissed without prejudice due to plaintiff's failure to submit the full filing fee as directed. Signed by Senior District Judge Sam A. Crow on 5/16/2011. (Mailed to pro se party Daniel Joseph Parrish by regular mail.) (smnd)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS DANIEL JOSEPH PARRISH, Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION No. 11-3054-SAC vs. LARNED STATE HOSPITAL, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER By its order of April 12, 2011 (Doc. 5), the court determined this matter is subject to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. §1915(g), the “three strikes" provision of the Prison Litigation Reform Act. Plaintiff was granted thirty days to submit the full filing fee, and he was notified that the failure to pay the fee within that time would result in the dismissal of this matter without prejudice. Since that time, plaintiff has not submitted the filing fee, nor has he shown that he is in imminent danger of serious bodily harm, as he must to avoid the bar imposed by 28 U.S.C. §1915(g).1 1 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) codifies the “three strikes” rule that bars an inmate who has had three prior actions or appeals dismissed as frivolous, malicious, or for failing to state a Accordingly, the court concludes this matter must be dismissed without prejudice. IT IS, THEREFORE, BY THE COURT ORDERED this matter is dismissed without prejudice due to plaintiff’s failure to submit the full filing fee as directed. A copy of this Memorandum and Order shall be transmitted to the plaintiff. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: This 16th day of May, 2011, at Topeka, Kansas. S/ Sam A. Crow SAM A. CROW United States Senior District Judge viable claim from proceeding in a civil action in forma pauperis “unless the prisoner is in imminent danger of serious physical injury.” 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?