Loggins v. Sedgwick County Sheriff's Department et al

Filing 5

ORDER ENTERED: Plaintiff's motion 2 for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied. This action is dismissed and all relief is denied without prejudice. This action counts as a strike under 28 U.S.C. 1915(g). Signed by Senior District Judge Sam A. Crow on 7/20/2011. (Mailed to pro se party Kevin D. Loggins by regular mail.) (smnd) Modified to add text on 7/20/2011 (smnd).

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS KEVIN D. LOGGINS, Plaintiff, v. CASE NO. 11-3079-SAC SEDGWICK COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT, et al., Defendants. O R D E R The initial pleading filed in this action was entitled “Motion Seeking . . . Court Order regarding Movants Subpoena.” Upon screening, Mr. Loggins was given time to pay, or object to, an initial partial filing fee and show cause why this action should not be dismissed for failure to state a claim for relief. He was also directed to show cause why this action should not be counted as a strike. The time in which Mr. Loggins was required to comply with the court’s Order has expired and nothing further has been submitted by him. “Rule 41(b) authorizes a district court, upon a defendant’s motion, to order the dismissal of an action for failure to prosecute as well as for failure to comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure or ‘a court order’.” Young v. U.S., 316 Fed.Appx. 764, 771 (10th Cir. Mar. 12, 2009)(citing Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b)). “This rule has been interpreted as permitting district courts to dismiss actions sua sponte when one of these conditions is met.” Id. (citing Link v. Wabash R.R. Co., 370 U.S. 626, 630-31 (1962); Olsen v. Mapes, 333 F.3d 1199, 1204 n. 3 (10th Cir. 2003)). “In addition, it is well established in this circuit that a district court is not obligated to follow any particular procedures when dismissing an action without prejudice under Rule 41(b). at *6 (citations omitted). Id. The court concludes that this action must be dismissed on account of plaintiff’s failure to pay the assessed, initial partial filing fee, and failure to show cause why this action should not be dismissed for failure to state a claim. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. 2) is denied, and this action is dismissed and all relief is denied, without prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this action counts as a strike under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated this 20th day of July, 2011, at Topeka, Kansas. s/Sam A. Crow U. S. Senior District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?