Wilson v. Rokusek et al
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting 11 defendants' Motion to Stay Case; granting 14 defendants' Motion to Dismiss. Signed by District Judge J. Thomas Marten on 6/26/2012. Mailed to pro se party James L. Wilson by regular mail. (mss)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS
James L. Wilson,
Sgt. Mark Rokusek, et al.,
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
Appearing pro se, James L. Wilson brought the present action against Johnson County
Sheriff Sergeant Mark Rokusek, the Johnson County Sheriff’s Department, and the Johnson County
Board of Commissioners alleging excessive force by Rokusek during his October 22, 2010 arrest.
Following that arrest, and well before Wilson’s November 22, 2011 pro se action in this court, the
State of Kansas commenced a criminal prosecution against the plaintiff, State v. Wilson, Case No.
10-2615 (D. Johnson County), in which the State has charged Wilson with, among other things,
felony theft of a patrol vehicle and aggravated battery on a law enforcement officer. That criminal
prosecution is ongoing.
Two motions are before the court. In the first, the defendants collectively seek a stay of the
action until the related criminal action is resolved, pursuant to Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477, 487
(1994) and Beck v. Muskogee Police Dep't, 195 F.3d 553, 557 (10th Cir. 1999). Second, the
governmental entity defendants have moved to dismiss the actions against them because (1) the
Johnson County Sheriff’s Office is not an entity which can be directly sued under Kansas law,
pursuant to Fugate v. Unified Government of Wyandotte County, 161 F. Supp.2d 1261, 1266 (D.
Kan. 2001); (2) the Board of Commissioners has not been named a party to the action, and (3) in any
event Wilson has failed to allege the existence of any pattern or practice of wrongdoing which would
support Monell liability.
Wilson has responded to the motion to stay but has presented no response to the motion to
dismiss. His response is a brief narrative of the events of October 22, 2010, in which he repeats his
allegations of excessive force against Rokusek. But he supplies no reason why the action should not
be stayed in light of the ongoing state criminal proceedings. Further, his allegations provide no
rationale for imposing liability on the Board of Commissioners directly by demonstrating any pattern
or practice of constitutional deprivations, or otherwise respond to the motion to dismiss.
IT IS ACCORDINGLY ORDERED this 26th day of June, 2012 that the Motion to Dismiss
of the defendants Johnson County Sheriff’s Department and Johnson County Board of County
Commissioners of Johnson County, Kansas (Dkt. 14) is granted; the Motion to Stay by defendants
(Dkt. 11) is hereby granted, and all matters in the present action are stayed until 30 days following
the final disposition of the criminal charges against Plaintiff in State v. Wilson, Case No. 10-02615.
s/ J. Thomas Marten
J. THOMAS MARTEN, JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?