Jones (ID 69723) v. Heimgartner et al

Filing 151

ORDER granting 150 Motion to Stay Case. This case is stayed and held in abeyance while Petitioner returns to the Kansas state courts to seek a ruling on his new due process claim. The statute of limitations will be tolled while Petitioner seeks relief in state court. Petitioner is directed to file a status report with the Court every four (4) months, informing the Court of the status of the state court proceedings. Signed by Chief District Judge Julie A. Robinson on 2/28/2020. (smc)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS
CHARLES L. JONES,
Petitioner,
v.

Case No. 12-3055-JAR

REX PRYOR, et al.,
Respondents.

ORDER
On January 30, 2020, this Court granted Petitioner Charles Jones’ Motion for Leave to
Amend, allowing him to amend his habeas petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 to add a claim
alleging due process violations under Brady v. Maryland.1 Petitioner filed the amended Petition
on January 31, 2020.2 Petitioner’s new claim is unexhausted. Under the total exhaustion rule,
the Court is required to dismiss the petition without prejudice to allow the petitioner to return to
state court and present the unexhausted claim.3 Alternatively, under Rhines v. Weber, the Court
is permitted to stay and hold the case in abeyance while the petitioner exhausts the unexhausted
claim.4 The Court can stay and hold the petition in abeyance under Rhines if the Petitioner
demonstrates: (1) good cause for the failure to exhaust; (2) the unexhausted claims are
potentially meritorious; and (3) there is no indication that Petitioner engaged in intentionally
dilatory litigation tactics.5

1

Doc. 148; 373 U.S. 83 (1963).

2

Doc. 149.

3

Rose v. Lundy, 455 U.S. 509, 522 (1982).

4

544 U.S. 269 (2005).

5

Id. at 278.

Before the Court is the parties’ Joint Motion for Stay and Abeyance (Doc. 150). The
parties’ motion explains in detail how the three Rhines requirements are met in this case. For
substantially the same reasons set forth in the parties’ joint motion, the Court finds that Petitioner
has made the requisite showing under Rhines, and is entitled to have this case stayed and held in
abeyance while he exhausts his new claim in state court.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED BY THE COURT that the parties’ Joint Motion for
Stay and Abeyance (Doc. 150) is granted. This case is stayed and held in abeyance while
Petitioner returns to the Kansas state courts to seek a ruling on his new due process claim. The
statute of limitations will be tolled while Petitioner seeks relief in state court. Petitioner is
directed to file a status report with the Court every four (4) months, informing the Court of the
status of the state court proceedings.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: February 28, 2020
S/ Julie A. Robinson
JULIE A. ROBINSON
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

2