Bishop-Temple v. Starr et al
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying without prejudice 5 Motion for Default Judgment. Signed by District Judge Julie A. Robinson on 8/1/14. (kao)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS
DEBORAH STARR and ERVIN H.
Case No. 14-4050-JAR
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
Plaintiff Catherine Bishop-Temple filed this action alleging that Defendants Deborah
Starr and Ervin H. Johnson conspired together in a scheme to defraud Plaintiff of approximately
$420,000. She alleges Kansas state tort claims of conspiracy, negligence, and conversion, and a
claim of unjust enrichment. Before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion for Default Judgment against
Defendant Deborah Starr (Doc. 5). As described more fully below, the Clerk shall enter default
against Defendant Starr, however, Plaintiff’s motion for default judgment is denied without
The Complaint in this matter was filed on June 17, 2014. Defendant Starr was personally
served on June 18, 2014. A defendant shall serve an answer within twenty-one days after service
of the Complaint.1 Defendant has failed to file or serve an answer or otherwise respond. When
a party fails to plead or otherwise defend, and that fact is made to appear by affidavit or
Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(a)(1).
otherwise, default must be entered against that party.2
The Tenth Circuit has made clear however that “consistent damage awards on the same
claim are essential among joint and several tortfeasors.”3 In a case with multiple defendants,
“judgment should not be entered against a defaulting defendant before the case has been decided
on the merits as to the remaining defendants.”4 The Complaint asserts claims for relief against
joint tortfeasors, and the remaining defendant’s answer deadline has not yet expired. Therefore,
the motion for default judgment is premature.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED BY THE COURT that Plaintiff’s Motion for Default
Judgment against Defendant Deborah Starr (Doc. 5) is denied without prejudice. The Clerk is
directed to enter default against Defendant Starr. Upon adjudication of the claim against the
remaining defendant in this case, Plaintiff may refile her motion for default judgment and request
a damages hearing.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: August 1, 2014
S/ Julie A. Robinson
JULIE A. ROBINSON
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(a).
Hunt v. Inter-Globe Energy, Inc., 770 F.2d 145, 147 (10th Cir. 1985); see Frow v. De La Vega, 82 U.S.
552, 554 (1872).
Wilcox v. Raintree Inns of Am., Inc., 76 F.3d 934 (Table), 1996 WL 48857, at *2 (10th Cir. Feb. 2, 1996)
(discussing Frow, 82 U.S. at 554) (explaining that the rule applies when the defendants are jointly and severally
liable and where multiple defendants have closely related defenses).
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?