McCoy (ID 76894) v. Aramark Correctional Services et al
Filing
106
NOTICE AND ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE - IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that plaintiff shall show good cause in writing by June 15, 2018, why defendants Berry and Allen's motions for judgment on the pleadings should not be granted as unopposed, including any response plaintiff wishes the court to consider in this matter. Show Cause Response due by 6/15/2018. Signed by District Judge Carlos Murguia on 5/30/18. Mailed to pro se party DeRon McCoy, Jr. by regular mail. (kao)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS
DERON MCCOY, JR.,
Plaintiff,
v.
Case No. 16-3027
ARAMARK CORRECTIONAL SERVICES,
et al.,
Defendants.
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
On April 20, 2018, defendant Patricia Berry filed a Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings
(Doc. 99) and on May 7, 2018, defendant Cheryl Allen filed a Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings
(Doc. 103).
D. Kan. Rule 6.1(d) provides that any response to a motion for judgment on the pleadings must
be filed within 21 days of the motion. Any response to defendant Berry’s motion was due by May 11,
2018. Any response to defendant Allen’s motion was due May 29, 2018. Plaintiff has filed no
responses.
The court therefore orders plaintiff to show good cause in writing by June 15, 2018, why these
motions should not be granted as unopposed. Should plaintiff show good cause, he must also file any
response he would like the court to consider by June 15, 2018.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that plaintiff shall show good cause in writing by June 15,
2018, why defendants Berry and Allen’s motions for judgment on the pleadings should not be granted
as unopposed, including any response plaintiff wishes the court to consider in this matter.
Dated May 30, 2018, at Kansas City, Kansas.
-1-
s/ Carlos Murguia
CARLOS MURGUIA
United States District Judge
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?