Halford v. Menard, Inc.
Filing
51
SECOND AMENDED SCHEDULING ORDER and ORDER granting 50 joint motion to amend scheduling order. Dispositive motion deadline 7/31/2018. Proposed Pretrial Order due by 5/8/2018. Final Pretrial Conference set for 7/10/2018 at 10:30 AM in KC Courtroom 223 (JPO) before Magistrate Judge James P. O'Hara. Signed by Magistrate Judge James P. O'Hara on 3/29/2018. (amh)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS
TYRA HALFORD,
Plaintiff,
v.
Case No. 16-4193-DDC
MENARD, INC.,
d/b/a Menards,
Defendant.
SECOND AMENDED SCHEDULING ORDER
The parties have filed a joint motion (ECF No. 50) to amend the scheduling order
(ECF Nos. 12, 46). The court finds good cause to extend deadlines, and the scheduling
order is amended as follows:
a.
The final pretrial conference is rescheduled from May 7, 2018, to July 10,
2018, at 10:30 a.m., in the U.S. Courthouse, Room 223, 500 State Avenue, Kansas City,
Kansas. Unless otherwise notified, the undersigned magistrate judge will conduct the
conference. No later than May 8, 2018, defendant shall submit the parties’ proposed
pretrial
order
as
an
attachment
to
an
e-mail
directed
to
ksd_ohara_chambers@ksd.uscourts.gov. It shall be in the form available on the court’s
website (www.ksd.uscourts.gov), and the parties shall affix their signatures according to
the procedures governing multiple signatures set forth in paragraphs II(C)(2)(a) & (b) of
the Administrative Procedures for Filing, Signing, and Verifying Pleadings and Papers by
Electronic Means in Civil Cases.
b.
The dispositive motion deadline is moved to July 31, 2018.
1
All other provisions of the original and amended scheduling orders shall remain in
effect. The schedule adopted in this second amended scheduling order shall not be
modified except by leave of court upon a showing of good cause.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated March 29, 2018, at Kansas City, Kansas.
s/ James P. O’Hara
James P. O’Hara
U.S. Magistrate Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?