Halford v. Menard, Inc.

Filing 51

SECOND AMENDED SCHEDULING ORDER and ORDER granting 50 joint motion to amend scheduling order. Dispositive motion deadline 7/31/2018. Proposed Pretrial Order due by 5/8/2018. Final Pretrial Conference set for 7/10/2018 at 10:30 AM in KC Courtroom 223 (JPO) before Magistrate Judge James P. O'Hara. Signed by Magistrate Judge James P. O'Hara on 3/29/2018. (amh)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS TYRA HALFORD, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 16-4193-DDC MENARD, INC., d/b/a Menards, Defendant. SECOND AMENDED SCHEDULING ORDER The parties have filed a joint motion (ECF No. 50) to amend the scheduling order (ECF Nos. 12, 46). The court finds good cause to extend deadlines, and the scheduling order is amended as follows: a. The final pretrial conference is rescheduled from May 7, 2018, to July 10, 2018, at 10:30 a.m., in the U.S. Courthouse, Room 223, 500 State Avenue, Kansas City, Kansas. Unless otherwise notified, the undersigned magistrate judge will conduct the conference. No later than May 8, 2018, defendant shall submit the parties’ proposed pretrial order as an attachment to an e-mail directed to ksd_ohara_chambers@ksd.uscourts.gov. It shall be in the form available on the court’s website (www.ksd.uscourts.gov), and the parties shall affix their signatures according to the procedures governing multiple signatures set forth in paragraphs II(C)(2)(a) & (b) of the Administrative Procedures for Filing, Signing, and Verifying Pleadings and Papers by Electronic Means in Civil Cases. b. The dispositive motion deadline is moved to July 31, 2018. 1 All other provisions of the original and amended scheduling orders shall remain in effect. The schedule adopted in this second amended scheduling order shall not be modified except by leave of court upon a showing of good cause. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated March 29, 2018, at Kansas City, Kansas. s/ James P. O’Hara James P. O’Hara U.S. Magistrate Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?