McDiffett (ID 51141) v. Nance et al

Filing 67

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Show Cause Response due by 8/9/2019. Signed by Chief District Judge Julie A. Robinson on 07/15/2019. Mailed to pro se party Shawn W. McDiffett by regular mail. (tvn)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS SHAWN W. MCDIFFETT, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 17-3037-JAR-JPO CHARLES NANCE, et al., Defendants. ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE Plaintiff brings this pro se civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff previously notified the Court that he would be transferred to federal custody sometime after March 1, 2019.1 On February 14, 2019, the Court entered an Order directing Plaintiff to notify the Court through a proper notice of change of address as soon as he was transferred to a federal facility.2 On February 27, 2019, Defendants filed a Motion to Dismiss, or in the Alternative, for Summary Judgment.3 The website for the Bureau of Prisons (“BOP”) shows that Plaintiff is incarcerated at Yazoo City Medium FCI in Yazoo City, Mississippi.4 Plaintiff has not provided the Court with a notice of change of address, as directed by the Court in its February 14 Order. Plaintiff has also failed to respond to Defendants’ pending Motion to Dismiss, or in the Alternative, for Summary Judgment. 1 Doc. 54. 2 Doc. 55. 3 Doc. 58. 4 See https://www.bop.gov/inmateloc/ (last visited July 11, 2019). Yazzoo City Medium FCI is located at 2225 Haley Barbour Parkway, Yazoo City, MS 39194. See https://www.bop.gov/locations/institutions/yam/ (last visited July 11, 2019). Responses to dispositive motions “must be filed and served within 21 days.”5 Local Rule 7.4(b) provides that absent a showing of excusable neglect, a party or attorney who does not timely file a response brief waives the right to later file such a brief and that the court will decide such motions as unopposed and usually grant them without further notice. Plaintiff is therefore directed to good show cause, in writing, on or before August 9, 2019, why Defendants’ motion should not be granted as unopposed. Plaintiff shall also file any response to Defendants’ motions by August 9, 2019. If Plaintiff fails to respond to this order, or to file a response as directed, the Court will consider Defendants’ motion as unopposed as described in D. Kan. Rule 7.4(b). IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED BY THE COURT that Plaintiff show good cause, in writing, on or before August 9, 2019, why Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss, or in the Alternative, for Summary Judgment (Doc. 58) should not be granted as unopposed. Plaintiff shall file any response to Defendants’ motion by August 9, 2019. If Plaintiff fails to respond to this order, or to file responses as directed, the Court will consider Defendants’ motion as unopposed as described in D. Kan. Rule 7.4(b). The clerk is directed to mail this Order to Show Cause to Plaintiff’s current location according to the BOP’s website. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: July 15, 2019 s/ Julie A. Robinson JULIE A. ROBINSON CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 5 D. Kan. Rule 6.1(d)(2). 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?